TENDANCES : ICT STANDARDISATION - AFFECTS ON NEW ENTRANTS - RAMBUS CASE - COMMITMENT DECISIONS - PATENT POOLING

Standards, patent pooling and competition*

This is a set of 3 short papers on IP and standardisation. The first paper, assuming that in the field of ICT standardisation the future will look like the present, holds that developing corporate and government strategies on this assumption may prove a costly illusion for many actors. A scenarios analysis helps understand how key driving forces shift the tectonic plates of geopolitics, technology, society and corporate realities, and thus radically change the landscapes of codified knowledge, how it is generated, appropriated and controlled. And how this convulsions will impact the regimes of IP and standardisation and affect current incumbents and new entrants. The second paper explores the arguments in issue in the European Rambus case, including some that have not been publicly aired before. It explains what lessons SSOs and companies participating in SSOs can learn from Rambus and makes a broader point about the shortcomings of Article 9 commitment decisions. The third paper, “How to support new technology development and its commercial success by avoiding royalty stacking” supports the view that patent pooling are pro-competitve.

Whose Game ? Standards and their patents at 21st century's crossroads Konstantinos KARACHALIOS European Patent Office 1. The way knowledge is generated, codified, appropriated, controlled and/or diffused is at the heart of almost all antagonisms of our time, it can be seen as the great game of the 21st century. Several 'warriors' (in the Deleuzian sense of 'war machines') are entangled in this battle. Flagship corporations with their Global Innovation Networks fight against each other to tap knowledge resources all around the world, 'global sourcing' they call it. By doing so, they profoundly challenge the logic of states and their governments, who are not amused to see strategic knowledge to be outsourced to potential geopolitical rivals and off-shored to distant places, as

L'accès à cet article est réservé aux abonnés

Déjà abonné ? Identifiez-vous

L’accès à cet article est réservé aux abonnés.

Lire gratuitement un article

Vous pouvez lire cet article gratuitement en vous inscrivant.

 

Version PDF

Auteurs

Citation

Pascal Berghe, James Killick, Roberto Dini, Konstantinos Karachalios, Standards, patent pooling and competition*, mai 2010, Concurrences N° 2-2010, Art. N° 30984, www.concurrences.com

Visites 4327

Toutes les revues