Résultats de la recherche

30 janv. 2020

Prix prédateurs : La Cour de justice de l’Union européenne rejette les pouvois dans l’affaire des inspections opérées par la Commission à propos des pratiques de prédation qu’auraient mises en oeuvre l’opérateur historique ferroviaire tchèque (České dráhy)

Alain Ronzano • N° 1-2020

Le 30 janvier 2020, la Cour de justice de l’Union européenne a rendu un arrêt dans les affaires jointes C-538/18 et C-539/18 (České dráhy a.s. contre Commission européenne) à la faveur duquel elle rejette l’intégralité des pourvois introduits par l’opérateur historique ferroviaire tchèque, České dráhy, (...)

21 Nov 2019

Dominance in the pharmaceutical sector: An overview of EU and national case law

Marion Provost, Mélanie Thill-Tayara • Pharma & Dominance

The pharmaceutical sector stands out as being regularly under the scrutiny of competition authorities throughout Europe and has continued to be a key enforcement priority over the past 18 months, with notable developments in pay-for-delay and excessive pricing cases, as well as on market (...)

28 Oct 2019

The Indian Competition Commission orders an investigation against online travel agencies for imposing vertical restrictions and abuse of dominance (MakeMyTrip / OYO)

Soumya Hariharan, Nandita Sahai, Sakshi Agarwal • October 2019

Introduction The Federation of Hotel & Restaurant Associations of India (Informant), an association of hotels and restaurants in India, filed an Information with the Competition Commission of India (CCI) against MakeMyTrip India Pvt. Ltd. (MMT), Ibibo Group Private Limited (GoIbibo), (...)

3 Sep 2019

The Indian Supreme Court flips its jurisprudence on abuse of dominance in a case involving radios taxis alleged of predatory pricing (Uber)

Kavita Jitani • September 2019

On September 3, 2019 The Supreme Court of India vide its judgement in Uber India Systems Pvt. Ltd. (Uber) v. Competition Commission of India (CCI) appears to have flipped the jurisprudence on abuse of dominance under the Indian Competition Act, 2002 (the “Act”) by requiring the assessment of the (...)

3 Sep 2019

The Indian Supreme Court dismisses an appeal against an investigation into an allegations of abuse of dominance (Uber)

Basu Chandola • September 2019

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA UPHOLDS INVESTIGATION AGAINST UBER* The Hon’ble Supreme Court of India has dismissed an appeal[Uber India Systems Pvt. Ltd v Competition Commission of India, Civil Appeal No. 641 of 2017] filed by Uber India Systems Pvt. Ltd. (‘Uber’) against an order of the erstwhile (...)

3 Sep 2019

The Indian Supreme Court requests Director General of the CCI (DG) to continue the investigation allegations relating to abuse of dominance (Uber / NCR)

Pallavi Shroff, John Handoll, Naval Satarawala Chopra, Shweta Shroff Chopra, Harman Singh Sandhu, Manika Brar, Aparna Mehra, Gauri Chhabra, Yaman Verma, Rohan Arora • September 2019

Deciding on an appeal from the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT), the Supreme Court requested the Director General, CCI (DG) to continue investigating allegations relating to abuse of dominance by Uber in the National Capital Region (NCR). [1] In considering whether the (...)

18 Jul 2019

The EU Commission fines a chipmaker company €242 million for predatory pricing (Qualcomm)

European Commission • July 2019

Antitrust: Commission fines US chipmaker Qualcomm €242 million for engaging in predatory pricing* The European Commission has fined Qualcomm €242 million for abusing its market dominance in 3G baseband chipsets. Qualcomm sold below cost, with the aim of forcing its competitor Icera out of the (...)

18 Jul 2019

The EU Commission fines a chipmaker company €242 million for predatory pricing in the market of 3G baseband chipsets (Qualcomm)

Maurits Dolmans, David Little, Wanjie Lin • July 2019

On 18 July 2019, the European Commission (“EC”) fined Qualcomm for abusing its market dominance by selling 3G baseband chipsets below cost, to force its competitor Icera out of the market. The EC found that Qualcomm sold three of its UMTS (a 3G standard) chipsets at predatory levels between (...)

18 juil. 2019

Notion d’abus : La Commission européenne inflige au fabricant dominant de circuits intégrés une amende de 242 millions d’euros pour une pratique de prix d’éviction (Qualcomm)

Alain Ronzano • N° 4-2019

Le 18 juillet 2019, la Commission européenne a annoncé qu’elle avait infligé à Qualcomm une amende de 242 millions d’euros, laquelle représente 1,27 % de son chiffre d’affaires, pour avoir abusé de la position dominante qu’elle occupait sur le marché des chipsets de bande de base 3G, lesquels permettent (...)

18 Jul 2019

The EU Commission fines a company €242 million for engaging in predatory pricing in the market for 3G baseband chipsets (Qualcomm)

Tim Kasten • July 2019

On 18 July 2019, the Commission announced that it had adopted a decision against Qualcomm for abusing a dominant position in the market for 3G baseband chipsets, and imposed a fine of € 242 million. According to the Commission, Qualcomm’s prices to certain key customers were below its costs with (...)

18 juil. 2019

Abus d’éviction : La Commission européenne sanctionne l’opérateur dominant sur le marché des puces électroniques pour la norme 3G pour une stratégie de prix prédateurs (Qualcomm)

Frédéric Marty • N° 4-2019 • pp. 98-99

La Commission européenne a sanctionné Qualcomm pour abus d’éviction sur le marché des circuits intégrés. La stratégie d’éviction anticoncurrentielle mise en œuvre reposait, selon la Commission, sur une stratégie de prix prédateurs. Cette décision, assortie d’une sanction de 242 millions d’euros, n’est pour (...)

27 Jun 2019

The Canadian Competition Bureau announces that ticket vendors will pay $4 million penalty to settle drip pricing advertising case (Ticketmaster)

Steve Szentesi • June 2019

TICKETMASTER ENTITIES AGREE TO $4 MILLION PENALTY TO SETTLE DRIP PRICING ADVERTISING CASE On June 27, 2019, the Competition Bureau (Bureau) announced that Ticketmaster L.L.C., TNow Entertainment Group, Inc. and Ticketmaster Canada LP have agreed to pay a $4 million penalty and $500,000 of the (...)

27 Jun 2019

The District Court of Rotterdam annuls a €41 million fine imposed by the Dutch Competition Authority on a Dutch railway operator for allegedly abusing its dominant position (Nederlandse Spoorwegen)

Mariska Van De Sanden, Tialda Beetstra • June 2019

ABUSE OF DOMINANCE FINE OF € 41 MILLION FOR DUTCH RAILWAY OPERATOR ANNULED* Introduction The Authority for Consumers and Markets (“ACM“, the Dutch competition authority) was in 2017 – after years of silence – finally able to fine an undertaking for abuse of dominance. A heavy fine of almost € 41 (...)

6 Jun 2019

Competition law in the railway transport sector: An overview of EU and national case law

David Henry • Transport (rail)

The rail sector is notorious for its complexity and its endemic competition problems. In a damning account of the state of play in this sector, the European Commission (“EC”) recently lamented the continued absence of effective competition and innovation therein. Furthermore, the risks of (...)

2 May 2019

Price Abuses: An overview of EU and national case law

Sean Ennis • Price abuses

Allegations of pricing abuses have tested the boundaries of competition law for more than a century and remain an important activity for many competition authorities and courts. While pricing abuses constituted key parts of some early antitrust case, many commentators have urged that they are (...)

1 May 2019

USA/EU: The convergence and specifics of EU competition law and American antitrust law regarding the prohibition of price scissors as constitutive of abuse of dominance

Kane Abry-Diaw de Baye • N° 2-2019

In this paper, the author reports on how the European and American Competition Authorities apprehend margin squeeze, viz. the fact for dominant undertakings operating simultaneously as vertically-integrated entities and as downstream market participants to increase wholesale prices by reducing (...)

9 Apr 2019

The EU General Court dismisses appeal against Commission’s request for information (Qualcomm)

Martin Favart • April 2019

On 9 April 2019, the General Court (“GC”) dismissed the appeal lodged by Qualcomm against the Commission’s decision of 31 March 2017 requesting information in the context of an investigation against Qualcomm for alleged predatory pricing contrary to Article 102 of the Treaty on the Functioning of (...)

5 mars 2019

La réparation des préjudices causés par les pratiques anticoncurrentielles Section 2. L’évaluation des préjudices causés par des pratiques d’éviction

Jean-François Laborde, Rafael P. Amaro

Recueil de décisions commentées – R. Amaro et J.-F. Laborde 181 c) Mais, parce qu'elle a augmenté ses prix, la demanderesse a vu le volume de ses ventes diminuer, ce qui lui a causé une perte de marge d'environ 3 millions de couronnes 376. d) Le préjudice indemnisable ressort donc à environ 15 − (...)

6 Nov 2018

The Indian Competition Authority dismisses abuse of dominance allegations in the market for online marketplace platforms because it finds no dominance in the relevant market (All India Online Vendors Association / Flipkart India)

Man Mohan Sharma • November 2018

CCI defines online sale platform as a separate relevant market -holds neither Flipkart nor Amazon as dominant in the market for online marketplace platforms* CCI, by way of order dated 06.11.2018 has dismissed allegations against Flipkart India Private Limited (“Flipkart India”) and Flipkart (...)

1^er oct. 2018

Petit manuel (irrévérencieux) d’économie Chapitre 8. Résister, encore et toujours, à l’illusion protectionniste

Emmanuel Combe

197 Chapitre 8 Résister, encore et toujours, à l’illusion protectionniste Avec l’élection de Donald Trump aux Etats-Unis et l’essor de mouvements populistes en Europe – à l’image de la France Insoumise o\ u du Front National dans notre pays-, le protectionnisme n’a jamais reçu un écho aussi favorable (...)

19 Jul 2018

The EU Commission sends supplementary statement of objection to a manufacturer of LTE baseband chipsets for predatory pricing practices (Qualcomm)

Robert Bell • July 2018

QUALCOMM RECEIVES SUPPLEMENTARY STATEMENT OF OBJECTIONS FROM THE EU COMMISSION IN PREDATORY PRICING INVESTIGATION* Hot on the heels of the announcement of a record antitrust fine imposed by the European antitrust regulator upon another US technology company , the European Commission announced (...)

5 juil. 2018

Dommage : La Cour de justice de l’Union européenne juge que les pertes subies à la suite d’une pratique de prix prédateurs peuvent constituer un dommage fondant la compétence des juridictions du lieu où il s’est matérialisé aux fins d’une action en réparation (flyLAL-Lithuanian Airlines)

Alexandre Lacresse • N° 4-2018 • pp.166-168

Cette affaire pose la très intéressante question du sort de l’action en réparation d’un dommage anticoncurrentiel dans un contexte international, en particulier en ce qu’elle interroge sur le “lieu où le fait dommageable s’est produit” au sens de la convention de Bruxelles de 1968 sur la compétence (...)

24 May 2018

The Croatian Competition Authority finds that a dominant telecommunication company did not abuse its dominance through predatory pricing (VIPnet)

Croatian Competition Authority • May 2018

VIPnet – no abuse of dominant position* The Croatian Competition Agency (CCA) found that VIPnet did not abuse a dominant position in the access to public telephone network at a fixed location for residential and/or non-residential customers, retail fixed broadband access and Pay television in (...)

8 Mar 2018

The Turkish Competition Board decides not to open an investigation against a company active in online sales of flowers, edible flowers and gifts following allegations of predatory pricing (Çiçek Sepeti)

Eda Duru, Gönenç Gürkaynak • March 2018

This case summary includes an analysis of the Turkish Competition Board’s (“Competition Board” or “Board”) Çiçek Sepeti decision (08.03.2018; 18-07/111-58). The Board reviewed the allegations put forward by Çiçek Satış A.Ş. (“Çiçek Satış”) against Çiçek Sepeti İnternet Hizmetleri A.Ş. (“Çiçek Sepeti”) (...)

5 Mar 2018

The US District Court for the Northern District of California denies a motion for class certification for a proposed class of indirect purchasers of lithium ion batteries (Lithium Ion Batteries)

Matt Evola • March 2018

Indirect purchaser plaintiffs’ motion for class certification in a lithium ion battery suit was denied for failing to show concrete evidence linking increased input costs to increased end-product prices; theoretical inference is not enough. What happened: The US District Court for the Northern (...)

31 Oct 2017

Buyer Power in EU Competition Law Part IV. Exerting Buyer Power. Exclusion and Exploitation
Chapter 6. Exclusionary Buyer Power

Ignacio Herrera Anchustegui

PART IV EXERTING BUYER POWER. EXCLUSION AND EXPLOITATION I. Herrera Anchustegui — Buyer Power in EU Competition Law 2076 EXCLUSIONARY BUYER POWER I. Introduction to Part IV and buyer power exclusion This Part IV constitutes the core of this study as it deals with the conducts and theories of (...)

15 sept. 2017

Etats-Unis : Le Tribunal du district Sud de l’Iowa rejette une allégation de tentative de monopolisation, fondée sur des pratiques de compression de marges, dans le secteur des sodas (Mahaska Bottling v. PepsiCo)

Jean-Christophe Roda • N° 1-2018 • pp. 211-214

Par une décision du 15 septembre 2017, le Tribunal fédéral du district Sud de l’Iowa était amené à se prononcer sur une allégation de tentative de monopolisation, elle-même basée sur des pratiques tarifaires mises en œuvre par un des géants du secteur des sodas, l’entreprise PepsiCo. La plaignante, un (...)

7 sept. 2017

Prix prédateurs : L’Autorité de la concurrence accepte et rend obligatoires les engagements souscrits par l’opérateur gazier historique à propos de ses offres de marché (Engie)

Alain Ronzano • N° 4-2017

À la faveur d’une décision n° 17-D-16 rendue le 7 septembre 2017, l’Autorité de la concurrence a accepté et rendu obligatoire les engagements pris par Engie à propos de pratiques tarifaires relatives aux offres de marché de gaz. Ce faisant, elle clôt la procédure au fond ouverte en octobre 2015 à la (...)

19 Jul 2017

The Indian Competition Authority dismisses allegations of abuse of dominance against a company in the market for radio taxi services and holds that high market share does not by itself constitute dominance (Fast Track Call Cab / ANI Technologies / OLA Cabs)

Man Mohan Sharma • July 2017

CCI closes case of alleged abuse of dominance by ANI Technologies Pvt. Ltd. (OLA)* The CCI vide order dated July 19, 2017 closed the case of alleged abuse of dominant position by OLA. The complaint against OLA was filed by Fast Track Call Cab Pvt. Ltd. and Meru Travel Solutions Pvt. Ltd. (...)

9 Jun 2017

The Indian Competition Authority dismisses allegations of abuse of dominance against a company in the market for wireless telecommunications services and holds that financial strength does not by itself constitute dominance (Reliance Jio Infocomm)

Man Mohan Sharma • June 2017

CCI closes allegations of abuse of dominance against Reliance Jio* CCI vide its orders dated June 9, 2017 and June 15, 2017 closed allegations of abuse of dominant position against Reliance Jio Infocomm Limited (RJIL). The Informant in the first case was Bharti Airtel Limited (Airtel) and the (...)

1^er juin 2017

Prix prédateurs : L’Autorité de la concurrence rejette une plainte pour prix prédateur sur le marché naissant du transport par autocar en France (Transport de voyageurs)

Anne-Lise Sibony • N° 3-2017 • pp. 77-79

Bien qu’il s’agisse d’une décision de rejet, la décision de l’Autorité de la concurrence relative à des pratiques mises en œuvre dans le secteur du transport de voyageurs par autocar présente un intérêt dans la mesure où c’est la première décision rendue dans ce secteur ouvert à la concurrence par la loi (...)

1 Jun 2017

The Indian Competition Authority clears dominant mobile messaging service from abuse of dominance allegations (Fight for Transparency Society / WhatsApp)

Man Mohan Sharma • June 2017

CCI closes allegation of abuse of dominance against WhatsApp* CCI vide its recent order dated June 01, 2017 has closed an allegation of abuse of dominant position against popular message service WhatsApp. The complaint against WhatsApp was filed by an individual Vinod Kumar Gupta on behalf of (...)

22 May 2017

The Dutch Competition Authority fines a rail operator for winning tenders through various abuses of dominance (Nederlandse Spoorwegen)

Tim Kasten • Price abuses

On 29 June 2017, the Dutch Competition Authority (“DCA”) published the non-con dential version of a decision of 22 May 2017 imposing a €40.95 million fine on Dutch rail operator Nederlandse Spoorwegen (“NS”) for abusing its dominant position in the context of a tender for public transport services (...)

22 May 2017

The Dutch Competition Authority finds that the incumbent rail company abused its dominant position with two separate infringements (Nederlandse Spoorwegen)

Geneviève Borremans • May 2017

In the Netherlands, the public transport by rail is organised in two ways. On the one hand, there is the main railway network, which mainly covers the intercity connections and is exploited by NS. On the other hand, there are the regional railway networks, which include slow train services. The (...)

29 Dec 2016

The Finnish Supreme Administrative Court fines a milk producer for predatory pricing in the national fresh milk markets (Valio)

European Competition Network Brief • December 2016

The Supreme Administrative Court considered Valio’s milk pricing a violation of the Competition Act* The Supreme Administrative Court considered Valio’s milk pricing a violation of the Competition Act and ordered a penalty payment of EUR 70 million. In 2012, the FCCA deemed Valio guilty of (...)

7 Dec 2016

The Indian Competition Appellate Tribunal (COMPAT) requests an investigation into abuse of dominance by global taxi services company (Meru Travels Solutions / Uber India Systems)

Man Mohan Sharma • December 2016

COMPAT directs investigation against Uber India for Abuse of Dominance* COMPAT by its order dated December 7, 2016, has set aside the order dated February 10, 2016 of CCI closing the information filed against Uber India Systems Private Limited (“Uber”) for alleged abuse of dominant position and (...)

29 Nov 2016

The OECD holds a roundtable on price discrimination

OECD • November 2016

In recent years the scope for near perfect price discrimination, particularly in the digital economy, appears to have grown. This raises a question over how those jurisdictions in which exploitative price discrimination is an offence will respond. In contrast, the risk of price discrimination (...)

22 nov. 2016

Prix d’éviction : La Cour de cassation renvoie à la Cour d’appel de Paris l’affaire du fret ferroviaire (Euro cargo rail, SNCF)

Frédéric Marty • N° 1-2017 • pp. 105-107

La Cour de cassation casse et annule partiellement l’arrêt rendu par la Cour d’appel de Paris rendu le 6 novembre 2014 dans l’affaire du fret SNCF. Sa cassation partielle ne porte que sur les prix d’éviction caractérisés par l’Autorité de la concurrence dans sa décision n° 12-D-25 du 18 décembre 2012 qui (...)

10 Nov 2016

The EU Commission launches an investigation into a Czech railway incumbent for possible abuse of dominance (České dráhy)

European Commission • November 2016

Antitrust: Commission investigates practices of Czech railway incumbent České dráhy in passenger transport* The European Commission has opened an investigation to assess whether the Czech railway incumbent České dráhy, a.s. (ČD) charged prices below costs with the aim of shutting out competition in (...)

31 Aug 2016

The Indian Competition Authority dismisses allegations of predatory pricing in the market for auto-rickshaw services (Vilakshan Kumar Yadav / ANI Technologies)

Man Mohan Sharma • August 2016

CCI dismisses allegation of predatory pricing against ANI Technologies Ltd. in New Delhi and NCR* The CCI has dismissed allegation of abuse of dominant position through predatory by Ola Cabs and Taxi For Sure operator ANI Technologies Pvt. Ltd. The Information was filed by three individuals (...)

18 Aug 2016

The US Court of Appeal for the Sixth Circuit reaffirms necessity for recoupment in predatory pricing complaints (Energy Conversion)

Valerio Cosimo Romano • August 2016

Sixth Circuit dismisses a predatory pricing complaint in the solar panel industry* On 18 August 2016 the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, dismissed a predatory pricing complaint filed by Energy Conversion, a solar panel manufacturer based in the United States, against (...)

27 juin 2016

Standard de la preuve en matière d’abus de position dominante : le test du concurrent aussi efficace

David Spector, Frédéric Marty, Hans Zenger, Olivier Fréget

Déjeuner Droit & Économie organisé par la Revue Concurrences en partenariat avec Fréget—Tasso de Panafieu et MAPP.

20 Jun 2016

Choice - A New Standard for Competition Law Analysis? Consumer choice: the practical reason for both antitrust and consumer protection law

Neil Averitt, Robert H. Lande

CHOICE – A N EW STANDARD FOR COMPETITION LAW ANALYSIS ?229 Consumer choice: the practical reason for both antitrust and consumer protection law * NEIL W. A VERITT neil.averitt@gmail.com Opinion Columnist, FTC:WATCH Former Attorney, Offlce of Policy and Coordination, Federal Trade Commission (...)

2 May 2016

The French Competition Authority imposes several interim measures on an energy provider suspected of abuse of dominance (Engie)

French Competition Authority • May 2016

The Autorité de la concurrence issues several urgent interim measures on Engie so that the price of some of its market offers to business customers reflects its costs.* In brief Last October, Direct Enrgie made a referral to the Autorité de la concurrence. In particular it reported that (...)

13 avr. 2016

Abus de position dominante : La Cour d’appel de Paris rappelle aux opérateurs qui dénoncent une pratique de prédation doublée d’une pratique de subventions croisées qu’il leur appartient, à tout le moins, de démontrer l’existence d’un ensemble d’indices laissant présumer la commission de l’infraction (Imperial Pub/GPS/La Poste/Mediapost)

Alain Ronzano • Nº 3-2016

Le 13 avril 2016, la Chambre 5-4 de la Cour d’appel de Paris a rendu un instructif arrêt dans l’affaire SARL Impérial Pub et SARL GPS contre La Poste et sa filiale, la SAS Mediapost. Constatant à partir de 2010 une baisse de leur activité et la perte de clients importants, deux petits opérateurs (...)

9 Mar 2016

The Indian Competition Appellate Tribunal (COMPAT) upholds the Indian Competition Authority’s decision and clarifies requirements for interim injunction (Fast Track Call Cab / ANI Technologies - OLA Cabs)

Man Mohan Sharma • March 2016

COMPAT refuses interim relief to Fast Track Call Cabs in ongoing investigation against Ola for predatory pricing in radio taxi services in Bengaluru* COMPAT by its order dated March 9, 2016 has upheld the CCI order dated September 3, 2015 refusing to grant interim injunction against (...)

6 Mar 2016

Postal services and competition law: An overview of EU and national case law

Christos Malamataris, Lars Kjølbye • Postal services

I. Introduction Postal services play a key role in a well-functioning and dynamic EU Single Market and they are of crucial importance to businesses and EU citizens alike. In particular, the parcel sector is experiencing significant growth in terms of volume and plays an important role in the (...)

10 févr. 2016

Prix prédateurs : L’Autorité de la concurrence rejette une saisine basée sur des prix prédateurs dans le domaine du recyclage des appareils électroniques

Frédéric Marty • N° 2-2016 • pp. 111-112

La décision de l’Autorité quant à une pratique alléguée de prix prédateurs dans le domaine du recyclage de déchets ménagers permet de souligner la nécessaire liaison des prix aux coûts pour attribuer une telle qualification à la politique tarifaire d’une entreprise donnée. Elle met également en exergue les (...)

10 févr. 2016

Pratiques d’éviction : L’Autorité de la concurrence rejette pour absence d’éléments suffisamment probants la saisine et la demande de mesures conservatoires de l’un des trois éco-organismes généralistes agréés pour assurer la prise en charge et l’élimination des équipements électriques et électroniques (ERP / Eco-systèmes)

Alain Ronzano • N° 2-2016

Le 10 février 2016, l’Autorité de la concurrence a rendu une intéressante décision n° 16-D-03 aux termes de laquelle elle rejette sur le fondement de l’article L. 462-8 du code de commerce la saisine de la société European Recycling Platform France (ERP) et par conséquent la demande de mesures (...)

1^er févr. 2016

Le contentieux indemnitaire des pratiques anticoncurrentielles (janvier – décembre 2015)

Rafael P. Amaro • N° 1-2016 • pp. 251-260

Pour sa première parution, cette chronique semestrielle d’actualité du contentieux indemnitaire des pratiques anticoncurrentielles propose une sélection de décisions rendues en 2015 par des juridictions françaises, principalement des juridictions du fond. Il y apparaît que le contentieux indemnitaire (...)

total	324
total_found	324
time	0.156

Votre recherche donne 324 résultats Prix prédateurs

Debug

Métas associées