The Turkish Competition Authority evaluates four stand-alone transactions upon a complaint received in the construction sector and concludes that the transactions are not subjected to an approval given that the jurisdictional turnover thresholds is not met (Akdağ Beton / Şenerler Beton / Saray Beton / Sarıkaya Beton / Üç Yıldırım)

This case summary concerns an analysis of the Board’s Akdağ Beton/Şenerler Beton/Saray Beton/Sarıkaya Beton/Üç Yıldırım decision, [1] based on an investigation initiated due to a complaint filed with the Turkish Competition Authority against certain ready-mixed concrete companies that were active in Yozgat, Turkey. The Board evaluated four stand-alone transactions that had been executed without the Board’s approval under Article 11 of the Law No. 4054 on the Protection of Competition (“ Law No. 4054 ”), and ultimately resolved that the transactions indeed did not require a mandatory merger control filing before the Turkish Competition Authority since the applicable jurisdictional thresholds had not been satisfied. The decision is significant in that it does not provide any insight on whether the

L'accès à cet article est réservé aux abonnés

Déjà abonné ? Identifiez-vous

L’accès à cet article est réservé aux abonnés.

Lire gratuitement un article

Vous pouvez lire cet article gratuitement en vous inscrivant.

 

Version PDF

Auteurs

  • ELIG Gürkaynak Attorneys-at-Law (Istanbul)
  • ELIG Gürkaynak Attorneys-at-Law (Istanbul)

Citation

Gönenç Gürkaynak, Eda Duru, The Turkish Competition Authority evaluates four stand-alone transactions upon a complaint received in the construction sector and concludes that the transactions are not subjected to an approval given that the jurisdictional turnover thresholds is not met (Akdağ Beton / Şenerler Beton / Saray Beton / Sarıkaya Beton / Üç Yıldırım), 7 août 2019, e-Competitions Turkish Antitrust, Art. N° 96513

Visites 12

Tous les numéros

  • Latest News issue 
  • Tous les News issues
  • Latest Special issue 
  • Tous les Special issues