The German Federal Fiscal Court holds that legitimate expectations do not provide a sufficient basis for annulling a decision by the EU Commission on recovery of State aid where the notification obligation has not been complied with and that "time barring" national rules are ineffective due to the primacy of EU law

The Federal Fiscal Court (Bundesfinanzhof) clarified that it was prevented from re-assessing the lawfulness of the Commission decision ordering recovery of aid, and in particular its finding that the relevant tax provisions involve State aid. It ruled that Germany’s obligation to recover unlawful State aid remains unaffected (i) by the alleged retroactive effect of aid recovery, (ii) by the expiry of the statutory limitation period in tax law, and (iii) by the alleged legitimate expectations of the aid beneficiary. Background & facts of the case The Applicant is engaged in greenhouse cultivation. The Defendant, the Main Customs Office (Hauptzollamt), granted the Applicant a tax refund for the years 2001 to 2004 under Section 25 (3a)1, No. 1.4 1993 German Mineral Oil Tax Act

L'accès à cet article est réservé aux abonnés

Déjà abonné ? Identifiez-vous

L’accès à cet article est réservé aux abonnés.

Lire gratuitement un article

Vous pouvez lire cet article gratuitement en vous inscrivant.

 

Version PDF

Auteurs

  • Gleiss Lutz (Brussels)
  • Jones Day (Brussels)
  • Gleiss Lutz (Brussels)

Citation

Ulrich Soltész, Philipp Werner, Harald Weiss, The German Federal Fiscal Court holds that legitimate expectations do not provide a sufficient basis for annulling a decision by the EU Commission on recovery of State aid where the notification obligation has not been complied with and that "time barring" national rules are ineffective due to the primacy of EU law, 30 janvier 2009, e-Competitions State aid & National enforcement, Art. N° 108696

Visites 45

Tous les numéros

  • Latest News issue 
  • Tous les News issues
  • Latest Special issue 
  • Tous les Special issues