The US Supreme Court shows to be driven by concerns with burdens of national litigation process according to recent antitrust decisions (Bell Atlantic / Twombly)

U.S. Antitrust Decisions Frequently Driven by Concerns With Burdens of U.S. Litigation Process* Welcome to our blog! I thought I would start my postings on U.S. developments with a broader point about recent U.S. case law in the antitrust area. Many of the most important U.S. judicial decisions in antitrust have been driven by judicial concern with aspects of the U.S. litigation process that are perceived by some to impose excessive costs and burdens on the parties – especially on defendants, who often bear most of the costs and risks of antitrust litigation. The massive cost of “discovery” in U.S. antitrust cases drives much of the concern, but recent U.S. decisions have also been driven by concerns with the burdens of the class action process. High Cost of U.S. Litigation As anyone

L'accès à cet article est réservé aux abonnés

Déjà abonné ? Identifiez-vous

L’accès à cet article est réservé aux abonnés.

Lire gratuitement un article

Vous pouvez lire cet article gratuitement en vous inscrivant.

 

Version PDF

Auteur

  • Gibson Dunn (New York)

Citation

Eric Stock, The US Supreme Court shows to be driven by concerns with burdens of national litigation process according to recent antitrust decisions (Bell Atlantic / Twombly), 21 mai 2007, e-Competitions Due Process Research Program, Art. N° 35693

Visites 1026

Tous les numéros

  • Latest News issue 
  • Tous les News issues
  • Latest Special issue 
  • Tous les Special issues