The US Supreme Court issues a decision limiting the circumstances under which a federal agency may be compelled to disclose the confidential information received by the agency, from a private party (Food Marketing Institute / Argus Leader Media)

On June 24, 2019, the Supreme Court of the United States issued an important decision limiting the circumstances under which a federal agency may be compelled to disclose “confidential” information the agency received from a private party, and which the agency seeks to withhold under the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”), specifically its Exemption 4. In Food Marketing Institute v. Argus Leader Media, the Court invalidated the “substantial competitive harm” test that circuit courts for decades applied as a necessary condition for information to receive confidential treatment under FOIA’s Exemption 4. The Court held that imposition of a competitive harm requirement was inconsistent with the language of the statute. Rather, information may be protected by Exemption 4 where it has actually

L'accès à cet article est réservé aux abonnés

Déjà abonné ? Identifiez-vous

L’accès à cet article est réservé aux abonnés.

Lire gratuitement un article

Vous pouvez lire cet article gratuitement en vous inscrivant.

 

Version PDF

Auteurs

  • Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton (Washington)
  • Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton (Washington)
  • Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton (Washington)
  • Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton (New York)

Citation

Nowell D. Bamberger, Matthew D. Slater, Alexis Collins, Vicens Elizabeth, The US Supreme Court issues a decision limiting the circumstances under which a federal agency may be compelled to disclose the confidential information received by the agency, from a private party (Food Marketing Institute / Argus Leader Media), 24 juin 2019, e-Competitions Due Process Research Program, Art. N° 91131

Visites 217

Tous les numéros

  • Latest News issue 
  • Tous les News issues
  • Latest Special issue 
  • Tous les Special issues