The Dutch Trade and Industry Appeals Tribunal confirms that a fair and public hearing within a reasonable time can be interpreted as a period of up to two years or longer in an antitrust procedure (Aesculaap)

Introduction The Aesculaap case concerns an infringement of Article 6 of the Dutch Competition Act ("Mw") on the grounds that AUV - the procurement collective and wholesaler of veterinary pharmaceuticals -, and Aesculaap - the only other wholesaler of veterinary pharmaceuticals - had adopted a joint system of exclusion by refusing to supply veterinarians who did not adhere to the internal rules of AUV. The NMa considered this system, operative until 2001, to lead to price distortion and market division amongst the veterinarians. In first instance, the District Court Rotterdam (Rechtbank Rotterdam) reduced the fine imposed for exceeding the reasonable time period by the Netherlands Competition Authority (the "NMa"). Both the NMa and Aesculaap appealed this judgment. One of the

L'accès à cet article est réservé aux abonnés

Déjà abonné ? Identifiez-vous

L’accès à cet article est réservé aux abonnés.

Lire gratuitement un article

Vous pouvez lire cet article gratuitement en vous inscrivant.

 

Version PDF

Auteurs

  • Simmons & Simmons (Brussels)
  • Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer (Amsterdam)

Citation

Robert Hardy, Arne Bleeker, The Dutch Trade and Industry Appeals Tribunal confirms that a fair and public hearing within a reasonable time can be interpreted as a period of up to two years or longer in an antitrust procedure (Aesculaap), 3 juillet 2008, e-Competitions Due Process Research Program, Art. N° 27211

Visites 1277

Tous les numéros

  • Latest News issue 
  • Tous les News issues
  • Latest Special issue 
  • Tous les Special issues