The Canadian Supreme Court rules that specific authorisation needed to search computers and mobile phones (Vu)

Introduction The Supreme Court of Canada (“court”) ruled on 7 November 2013 in R v Vu that specific warrant authorisation is needed to execute searches of computers and mobile phones. [1] While the decision concerned alleged offences related to the production and possession of marijuana, it most likely also applies to searches pursuant to the Competition Act (“Act”). [2] Background Police in the province of British Columbia obtained a warrant to search a residence for evidence of the theft of electricity. The warrant did not specifically refer to the search of computers. Investigators nevertheless searched two computers and a mobile phone and found evidence that the appellant was the occupant of the residence. He was charged with several criminal offences. The appellant claimed at

L'accès à cet article est réservé aux abonnés

Déjà abonné ? Identifiez-vous

L’accès à cet article est réservé aux abonnés.

Lire gratuitement un article

Vous pouvez lire cet article gratuitement en vous inscrivant.

 

Version PDF

Auteur

  • Commonwealth Secretariat (London)

Citation

Gavin Murphy, The Canadian Supreme Court rules that specific authorisation needed to search computers and mobile phones (Vu), 7 novembre 2013, e-Competitions Due Process Research Program, Art. N° 62303

Visites 130

Tous les numéros

  • Latest News issue 
  • Tous les News issues
  • Latest Special issue 
  • Tous les Special issues