The US Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit rules that the campaign of a hospital holding to block a potential rival does not violate s. 2 of the Sherman Act and is protected from antitrust liability under the Noerr-Pennington doctrine (Mercatus Group / Lake Forest Hospital)

First Amendment Rights Provide Antitrust Shield for Successful Petitioning to Block Potential Rival* How far can a competitor go in an effort to convince a local government to block a potential rival from setting up shop in its area without running afoul of the antitrust laws? Last week, the U.S. Court of Appeals in Chicago ruled that a hospital was shielded from antitrust liability for allegedly making misrepresentations during local zoning proceedings and engaging in a public relations campaign in its effort to prevent the opening of a competing “physician center.” The challenged conduct was protected by the so-called Noerr-Pennington doctrine. Summary judgment in favor of the hospital (695 F.Supp2d 811, CCH 2010-1 Trade Cases ¶76,919) was affirmed. The action was brought

L'accès à cet article est réservé aux abonnés

Déjà abonné ? Identifiez-vous

L’accès à cet article est réservé aux abonnés.

Lire gratuitement un article

Vous pouvez lire cet article gratuitement en vous inscrivant.

 

Version PDF

Auteur

  • Wolters Kluwer (Riverwoods)

Citation

Jeffrey May, The US Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit rules that the campaign of a hospital holding to block a potential rival does not violate s. 2 of the Sherman Act and is protected from antitrust liability under the Noerr-Pennington doctrine (Mercatus Group / Lake Forest Hospital), 26 mai 2011, e-Competitions Due Process Research Program, Art. N° 36530

Visites 333

Tous les numéros

  • Latest News issue 
  • Tous les News issues
  • Latest Special issue 
  • Tous les Special issues