The US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denies Government’s en banc petition in Munibonds Statute of Limitations Case and confirms the limitation of the payment theory (Grimm)

Second Circuit Denies Government’s En Banc Petition in Munibonds Statute of Limitations Case* In its first Munibonds trial in 2012, the Antitrust Division convicted three former General Electric executives for rigging bids to suppress interest rates paid to municipalities on funds they raised through bonds and then invested in guaranteed investment contracts until such time as the funds were needed. The indictment charged that the interest rates were rigged on investment agreements ranging “from as short as one month to as long as thirty years.” The three defendants were in jail when the Second Circuit reversed their conviction in a split vote (2-1) on November 26 on statute of limitations grounds. An opinion followed: United States v. Grimm, 738 F.3d 498 (2d Cir 2013). The Antitrust

L'accès à cet article est réservé aux abonnés

Déjà abonné ? Identifiez-vous

L’accès à cet article est réservé aux abonnés.

Lire gratuitement un article

Vous pouvez lire cet article gratuitement en vous inscrivant.

 

Version PDF

Auteur

Citation

Robert E. Connolly, The US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denies Government’s en banc petition in Munibonds Statute of Limitations Case and confirms the limitation of the payment theory (Grimm), 15 août 2014, e-Competitions Due Process Research Program, Art. N° 68643

Visites 232

Tous les numéros

  • Latest News issue 
  • Tous les News issues
  • Latest Special issue 
  • Tous les Special issues