The EU Court of Justice AG Jääskinen postulates that the EU principle of effectiveness precludes a provision of national law which makes the grant of access to documents by a national court subject to the consent of the antitrust infringers (Donau Chemie)

Pfleiderer revisited: the AG Opinion in Donau Chemie* On 7 February, AG Jääskinen issued his Opinion in Case C-536/11 Donau Chemie, a much anticipated case (at least among competition lawyers) concerning the compatibility with EU law of an Austrian law which prohibits third party access to the court files in “public law competition proceedings” absent the parties’ consent. The questions referred by the Austrian Cartel Court thus required the CJEU to venture into similar terrain to that covered by its Pfleiderer judgment (see this previous post for an application of Pfleiderer in a domestic case). The background, in brief, is that a trade association active in the printing sector sought to obtain access to documents on the file of the Cartel Court which related to proceedings which had

L'accès à cet article est réservé aux abonnés

Déjà abonné ? Identifiez-vous

L’accès à cet article est réservé aux abonnés.

Lire gratuitement un article

Vous pouvez lire cet article gratuitement en vous inscrivant.

 

Version PDF

Auteur

Citation

Christopher Brown, The EU Court of Justice AG Jääskinen postulates that the EU principle of effectiveness precludes a provision of national law which makes the grant of access to documents by a national court subject to the consent of the antitrust infringers (Donau Chemie), 7 février 2013, e-Competitions Due Process Research Program, Art. N° 62171

Visites 224

Tous les numéros

  • Latest News issue 
  • Tous les News issues
  • Latest Special issue 
  • Tous les Special issues