Article précédent

As Efficient Competitor Test: An overview of EU and national case law

I. Introduction Determining the appropriate standards to apply in Article 102 cases involving allegedly exclusionary conduct by a dominant firm continues to provide substantial room for debate between and within the legal and economic communities. However, the nature of the debate has progressed substantially since the European Commission adopted an approach to assessing whether a dominant firm’s conduct amounts to anti-competitive foreclosure that is more closely aligned with the economic literature by publishing its Priority Guidance Paper (“PGP”). [1] In this forward, I briefly review aspects of the case-law and outline the important contribution the PGP has made to the recent case-law. In doing so I have the benefit of a large prior literature including in particular Nazzini (2012)

L'accès à cet article est réservé aux abonnés

Déjà abonné ? Identifiez-vous

L’accès à cet article est réservé aux abonnés.

Lire gratuitement un article

Vous pouvez lire cet article gratuitement en vous inscrivant.

 

Version PDF

Auteur

  • The Brattle Group (London)

Citation

Peter Davis, As Efficient Competitor Test : An overview of EU and national case law, 4 avril 2019, e-Competitions As Efficient Competitor test, Art. N° 89776

Visites 2197

Tous les numéros

  • Latest News issue 
  • Tous les News issues
  • Latest Special issue 
  • Tous les Special issues