The Regional Court of Dortmund holds that standard arbitration agreements apply to cartel damages actions if and when the alleged conduct coincides with a breach of contract deviating from the EU Court of Justice foreseeability theory established for jurisdiction clauses (C. / N.)

1. Introduction The question of whether cartel damages claims can be tried in arbitration under so-called 'standard' arbitration agreements – meaning not explicitly referencing tortious or even specifically antitrust damages claims – has recently been the subject of much debate. Regarding jurisdiction clauses the same question had already been dealt with by the European Court of Justice ('ECJ') through its CDC Hydrogen Peroxide ruling of 2015 ('CDC') [1]: according to the ECJ cartel damages claims are not covered by standard contractual jurisdiction clauses if such cartel damages claims were not foreseeable at the time of the agreement. The ECJ did not comment on whether the same applied to arbitration clauses. Interestingly the ECJ's judgement at the time resulted from a request for

L'accès à cet article est réservé aux abonnés

Déjà abonné ? Identifiez-vous

L’accès à cet article est réservé aux abonnés.

Lire gratuitement un article

Vous pouvez lire cet article gratuitement en vous inscrivant.

 

Version PDF

Auteurs

  • Hogan Lovells (Munich)
  • Hogan Lovells (Munich)

Citation

Christian Ritz, Carolin Marx, The Regional Court of Dortmund holds that standard arbitration agreements apply to cartel damages actions if and when the alleged conduct coincides with a breach of contract deviating from the EU Court of Justice foreseeability theory established for jurisdiction clauses (C. / N.), 13 septembre 2017, e-Competitions September 2017, Art. N° 87908

Visites 613

Tous les numéros

  • Latest News issue 
  • Tous les News issues
  • Latest Special issue 
  • Tous les Special issues