The EU Court of Justice accepts an alternative to the United Brands test to establish excessive pricing (AKKA / LAA)

On replying to the preliminary questions referred by the Supreme Court of Latvia (SCL), in AKKA v LAA the CJEU has accepted a methodology other than the two-limb United Brands test to establish an excessive pricing practice [1]. The CJEU also clarifies the criteria to set the amount of the fine imposed on the collecting society that breached competition by charging excessive prices. The facts of the case In April 2013 the Competition Council of Latvia (CCL) found that AKKA/LAA, a collecting society, applied excessively high fees for licences for the public performance in shops and service centres of musical works the copyright of which was managed by AKKA/LAA. The CCL reached this conclusion by comparing the fees charged by AKKA/LAA with those applied in neighbouring Lithuania and

L'accès à cet article est réservé aux abonnés

Déjà abonné ? Identifiez-vous

L’accès à cet article est réservé aux abonnés.

Lire gratuitement un article

Vous pouvez lire cet article gratuitement en vous inscrivant.

 

Version PDF

Auteur

  • Desogus Law Office (Cagliari)

Citation

Michele Giannino, The EU Court of Justice accepts an alternative to the United Brands test to establish excessive pricing (AKKA / LAA), 14 septembre 2017, e-Competitions September 2017, Art. N° 84866

Visites 1042

Tous les numéros

  • Latest News issue 
  • Tous les News issues
  • Latest Special issue 
  • Tous les Special issues