The EU Court of Justice holds that in-house lawyers are not protected by legal professional privilege in antitrust investigations (Akzo)

On September 14, 2010, the Court of Justice (the Court) issued its judgment in Akzo v. Commission (Case C-550/07 P, hereinafter the Judgment) dismissing an appeal brought by Akzo Nobel Chemicals Ltd. (Akzo) against a judgment of the Court of First instance (now the General Court) of September 17, 2007. The Court upheld and clarified its former AM&S ruling (see Case 155/79) holding that in-house lawyers are not protected by legal professional privilege in antitrust investigations conducted by the European Commission even if the lawyer in question is admitted to, and subject to the ethical

L'accès à cet article est réservé aux abonnés

Déjà abonné ? Identifiez-vous

L’accès à cet article est réservé aux abonnés.

Lire gratuitement un article

Vous pouvez lire cet article gratuitement en vous inscrivant.

 

Version PDF

Auteurs

  • Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom (Brussels)
  • Dentons (Brussels)

Citation

Frederic Depoortere, James S. Venit, The EU Court of Justice holds that in-house lawyers are not protected by legal professional privilege in antitrust investigations (Akzo), 14 septembre 2010, e-Competitions September 2010, Art. N° 45408

Visites 349

Tous les numéros

  • Latest News issue 
  • Tous les News issues
  • Latest Special issue 
  • Tous les Special issues