The EU Court of Justice AG Bobek proposes to include protected legal interests within the threefold conditions for the ne bis in idem principle thereby allowing the Belgian Competition Authority to pursue a fine against a postal incumbent which had already been fined by its sectoral regulator (bpost / Nordzuck)

On 2 September 2021, Advocate General (AG) Bobek delivered his opinion in case C-117/20, bpost SA v. Autorité belge de la Concurrence, on the conditions of application of the ne bis in idem principle, pursuant to which one cannot be tried or punished for an infringement for which one has already been convicted or acquitted (prohibition of double jeopardy). Factual Background and Procedure The opinion of AG Bobek is the latest step in a long-standing legal battle between Belgian incumbent postal company bpost and the Belgian Competition Authority (Belgische Mededingingsautoriteit / Autorité belge de la Concurrence - the BCA) concerning bpost’s quantitative rebate scheme on so-called “consolidators”, i.e., intermediaries offering postal services such as preparing, processing and

L'accès à cet article est réservé aux abonnés

Déjà abonné ? Identifiez-vous

L’accès à cet article est réservé aux abonnés.

Lire gratuitement un article

Vous pouvez lire cet article gratuitement en vous inscrivant.

 

Version PDF

Auteurs

  • Van Bael & Bellis (Brussels)
  • Van Bael & Bellis (Brussels)

Citation

Valérie Lefever, Peter L'Ecluse, The EU Court of Justice AG Bobek proposes to include protected legal interests within the threefold conditions for the ne bis in idem principle thereby allowing the Belgian Competition Authority to pursue a fine against a postal incumbent which had already been fined by its sectoral regulator (bpost / Nordzuck), 2 septembre 2021, e-Competitions October 2021, Art. N° 102337

Visites 429

Tous les numéros

  • Latest News issue 
  • Tous les News issues
  • Latest Special issue 
  • Tous les Special issues