The EU General Court finds flaws in the EU Commission’s decision and quashes the €14,9 million fine, but sustains underlying liability for “facilitation” of a cartel (Icap)

The General Court’s November 2017 judgment is not such welcome news to ICAP as it might first appear. ICAP’s appeal against a 2015 infringement decision was successful insofar as the fines imposed on it will now be trimmed, but in the main the General Court supported the European Commission’s substantive findings. These include the conclusion that ICAP acted as a facilitator to the Yen LIBOR cartel - a useful reminder that an undertaking needn’t benefit directly from an anti-competitive agreement to find itself liable in the eyes of the (competition) law. Background In a February 2015 decision (the Decision) the European Commission (the Commission) held that ICAP participated in infringements of Article 101 TFEU in connection with the manipulation of the London Interbank Offered Rate

L'accès à cet article est réservé aux abonnés

Déjà abonné ? Identifiez-vous

L’accès à cet article est réservé aux abonnés.

Lire gratuitement un article

Vous pouvez lire cet article gratuitement en vous inscrivant.

 

Version PDF

Auteurs

  • Simmons & Simmons (London)
  • Simmons & Simmons (London)

Citation

Duncan Green, Charles Bankes, The EU General Court finds flaws in the EU Commission’s decision and quashes the €14,9 million fine, but sustains underlying liability for “facilitation” of a cartel (Icap), 10 novembre 2017, e-Competitions November 2017, Art. N° 85619

Visites 353

Tous les numéros

  • Latest News issue 
  • Tous les News issues
  • Latest Special issue 
  • Tous les Special issues