The US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit rules against a sports association’s policy of limiting the compensation paid to student-athletes and affirms limited injunctions (National Collegiate Athletic Association)

On 18 May 2020 the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled against the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) in an antitrust case challenging the association's policy of limiting the compensation paid to student-athletes. [1] The decision is the latest concerning the NCAA's amateurism rules, which have been challenged over the past few years as athletes and their advocates have argued for student-athletes to be compensated for their participation in competitive college sports. However, for the time being, the decision will not result in any significant practical changes in compensation for student-athletes at some NCAA member institutions. In March 2019 the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California ruled in favor of a plaintiff class comprised of

L'accès à cet article est réservé aux abonnés

Déjà abonné ? Identifiez-vous

L’accès à cet article est réservé aux abonnés.

Lire gratuitement un article

Vous pouvez lire cet article gratuitement en vous inscrivant.

 

Version PDF

Auteurs

Citation

Elizabeth B. Meers, Stephanie J. Gold, William F. Ferreira, Joel D. Buckman, Logan M. Breed, The US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit rules against a sports association’s policy of limiting the compensation paid to student-athletes and affirms limited injunctions (National Collegiate Athletic Association), 18 mai 2020, e-Competitions May 2020, Art. N° 95313

Visites 46

Tous les numéros

  • Latest News issue 
  • Tous les News issues
  • Latest Special issue 
  • Tous les Special issues