The U.S. Department of Justice prohibits a merger between the two leading providers of ratings and reviews platforms that resulted in the elimination of meaningful competition in that sector, despite the fact that the transaction was non reportable (Bazaarvoice / PowerReviews)

If you thought not having to report your proposed acquisition to the US Department of Justice and the US Federal Trade Commission meant never worrying about antitrust issues, think again. The DOJ’s recent pursuit of Bazaarvoice, Inc. in connection with its acquisition of PowerReviews, Inc. highlights that even non-reportable transactions can give rise to serious consequences. Remedies may include not only divestitures, but other measures meant to ensure effective competition—even the clawing back of profits gained from increased market power. The case also serves as a reminder to potential buyers to fully diligence potential targets. This includes reviewing the potential anticompetitive effects of the proposed transaction, as well as any recent unreported transactions completed by the

L'accès à cet article est réservé aux abonnés

Déjà abonné ? Identifiez-vous

L’accès à cet article est réservé aux abonnés.

Lire gratuitement un article

Vous pouvez lire cet article gratuitement en vous inscrivant.

 

Version PDF

Auteurs

  • White & Case (Washington)
  • White & Case (Washington)
  • White & Case (New York)

Citation

Rebecca H. Farrington, George Paul, Gregory Pryor, The U.S. Department of Justice prohibits a merger between the two leading providers of ratings and reviews platforms that resulted in the elimination of meaningful competition in that sector, despite the fact that the transaction was non reportable (Bazaarvoice / PowerReviews), 8 mai 2014, e-Competitions May 2014, Art. N° 67159

Visites 281

Tous les numéros

  • Latest News issue 
  • Tous les News issues
  • Latest Special issue 
  • Tous les Special issues