The UK Court of Appeal holds that beer distribution agreements containing ties were contrary to Article 101.1 TFEU and upholds an appeal for damages (Crehan)

In this well-known case, published for the seek of completness (See J. Derenne and T. Seidenspinner, “The English Court of appeal applies Art. 81 EC and award damages for breach of EC law (Crehan)”, e-Competitions, April 2005, n° 204) , the claimant, Mr. B. Crehan, appealed against the judgment handed down at first instance by Park J dismissing the claim for damages for breach of Art. 81(1) EC he brought against the defendant, Inntrepreneur Pub Company (hereinafter “IPC”). The facts of the case at hand were as follows. IPC was a holding company created by Grand Metropolitan, a brewer, and Courage Ltd, a major pub owner, following the elaboration of two British statutory instruments designed to put an end to monopoly situations in the supply of beer for retail purposes on licensed

L'accès à cet article est réservé aux abonnés

Déjà abonné ? Identifiez-vous

L’accès à cet article est réservé aux abonnés.

Lire gratuitement un article

Vous pouvez lire cet article gratuitement en vous inscrivant.

 

Version PDF

Auteur

  • London School of Economics (London)

Citation

Orla Lynskey, The UK Court of Appeal holds that beer distribution agreements containing ties were contrary to Article 101.1 TFEU and upholds an appeal for damages (Crehan), 21 mai 2004, e-Competitions May 2004, Art. N° 345

Visites 6531

Tous les numéros

  • Latest News issue 
  • Tous les News issues
  • Latest Special issue 
  • Tous les Special issues