The Turkish Competition Authority decides not to open an investigation against a company active in online sales of flowers, edible flowers and gifts following allegations of predatory pricing (Çiçek Sepeti)

This case summary includes an analysis of the Turkish Competition Board’s (“Competition Board” or “Board”) Çiçek Sepeti decision (08.03.2018; 18-07/111-58). The Board reviewed the allegations put forward by Çiçek Satış A.Ş. (“Çiçek Satış”) against Çiçek Sepeti İnternet Hizmetleri A.Ş. (“Çiçek Sepeti”) indicating that Çiçek Sepeti abused its dominant position by way of hindering its competitors’ activities. The Board decided that evaluations within the case would not amount to a violation of article 6 of Law No. 4054 on Protection of Competition (“Law No. 4054”). Accordingly, the Competition Board did not find it necessary to initiate a full-fledged investigation against Çiçek Sepeti. Background Çiçek Sepeti is a firm that is active in the online sales of flowers, edible flowers (bonnyfood) and gifts (bonnygift)

L'accès à cet article est réservé aux abonnés

Déjà abonné ? Identifiez-vous

L’accès à cet article est réservé aux abonnés.

Lire gratuitement un article

Vous pouvez lire cet article gratuitement en vous inscrivant.

 

Version PDF

Auteurs

  • ELIG Gürkaynak Attorneys-at-Law (Istanbul)
  • ELIG Gürkaynak Attorneys-at-Law (Istanbul)

Citation

Eda Duru, Gönenç Gürkaynak, The Turkish Competition Authority decides not to open an investigation against a company active in online sales of flowers, edible flowers and gifts following allegations of predatory pricing (Çiçek Sepeti), 8 mars 2018, e-Competitions March 2018, Art. N° 87346

Visites 141

Tous les numéros

  • Latest News issue 
  • Tous les News issues
  • Latest Special issue 
  • Tous les Special issues