This note considers one of the two cases recently heard by the “ordinary” courts (the High Court and Court of Appeal) (See also A. Jones, The UK Court of Appeal rejects an allegation of unreasonable refusal to supply and unlawful discriminatory pricing (Attheraces/British Horseracing Board), e-Competitions, April 2007-I, n° 13326) and of the two follow-on damages' claims (A. Jones, The UK Competition Appeal Tribunal is to rule on two follow-on damages' claims (Emerson Electric/Morgan Crucible; The Consumers' Association/JJB Sport), e-Competitions, April 2007-II, n° 13381) which have been lodged before the specialist Competition Appeal Tribunal (“CAT”) . In the UK, it is possible for private parties to enforce the competition rules either in
Partager sur
|
|
The UK High Court rules on interim injunction for an alleged unlawful refusal to supply in the pharmaceutical sector (AAH Pharmaceuticals / Pfizer-UniChem)
L'accès à cet article est réservé aux abonnés
Déjà abonné ? Identifiez-vous
L’accès à cet article est réservé aux abonnés.
Lire gratuitement un article
Vous pouvez lire cet article gratuitement en vous inscrivant.
