The US Supreme Court prohibits a sports professional association from imposing conditions on its members as it violates antitrust law (NCAA / Alston)

Some “Twinkling of the Eye” Thoughts on NCAA v. Alston* The Supreme Court’s decision in Nat’l Collegiate Athletic Ass’n v. Alston, Nos. 20-512 and 20-520, 2021 WL 2519036, (U.S. June 21, 2021) is a boost for the Antitrust Division’s commitment to prosecute what it calls naked “wage fixing” and “no poach” agreements. In the prosecutions it has brought to date (still in the early stages) defendants have argued that the rule of reason, not the per se rule, should apply, because the courts do not have sufficient experience with wage fixing and/or no poach to put them in the class of per se violations. One of the cases being litigated is United States v. Jindal, Case 4:20-cr-00358 (E.D. Tx). In a recent brief opposing the defendant’s motion to dismiss the indictment, the government recounts the

L'accès à cet article est réservé aux abonnés

Déjà abonné ? Identifiez-vous

L’accès à cet article est réservé aux abonnés.

Lire gratuitement un article

Vous pouvez lire cet article gratuitement en vous inscrivant.

 

Version PDF

Auteur

Citation

Robert E. Connolly, The US Supreme Court prohibits a sports professional association from imposing conditions on its members as it violates antitrust law (NCAA / Alston), 21 juin 2021, e-Competitions June 2021, Art. N° 101328

Visites 258

Tous les numéros

  • Latest News issue 
  • Tous les News issues
  • Latest Special issue 
  • Tous les Special issues