The German Federal Court of Justice clarifies that access to an essential facility does not require a dominant position in the upstream or downstream market in the electricity sector (Arealnetze)

On June 28, 2005, the German Federal Court of Justice (FCJ) clarified that the so called “essential facility clause” of Sec. 19(4) n° 4 of the German Act against Restraints of Competition (ARC) requires dominance only in the market for the essential facility itself. Contrary to the view of some commentators, it is not necessary that the owner of the essential facility is dominant on the downstream market as well. I. Facts of the case Several firms wanted to establish so-called “area networks” for electricity in development areas in Frankfurt upon Main. They had built small free-standing low-voltage power grids which connected their customers' households and/or enterprises with a voltage transformation substation. In order to supply their customers with electricity, these area networks

L'accès à cet article est réservé aux abonnés

Déjà abonné ? Identifiez-vous

L’accès à cet article est réservé aux abonnés.

Lire gratuitement un article

Vous pouvez lire cet article gratuitement en vous inscrivant.

 

Version PDF

Auteur

Citation

Florian Wagner-von Papp, The German Federal Court of Justice clarifies that access to an essential facility does not require a dominant position in the upstream or downstream market in the electricity sector (Arealnetze), 28 juin 2005, e-Competitions June 2005, Art. N° 488

Visites 5427

Tous les numéros

  • Latest News issue 
  • Tous les News issues
  • Latest Special issue 
  • Tous les Special issues