The Czech Competition Authority states that a bus station operator’s refusal of access to a facility amounts to abuse of a dominant position even if the conditions of the essential facilities doctrine are not met (ČSAD Liberec)

On 6 June 2005 the Czech Republic's Office for the Protection of Competition (“the Office”) issued a decision whereby it established that a bus service and station operator in a Czech city abused its dominant position when it refused to allow a competing carrier to use its bus station for despatching coach services between that city and an other one. This decision was challenged in a remonstrance, and it therefore is not yet final. The decision is interesting primarily because of the way in which the Office has applied the essential facilities doctrine in this case; in the Czech analogy of Article 82 of the Treaty of the European Communities (Section 11 of the Act on the

L'accès à cet article est réservé aux abonnés

Déjà abonné ? Identifiez-vous

L’accès à cet article est réservé aux abonnés.

Lire gratuitement un article

Vous pouvez lire cet article gratuitement en vous inscrivant.

 

Version PDF

Auteur

  • Wolf Theiss (Prague)

Citation

Robert Pelikán, The Czech Competition Authority states that a bus station operator’s refusal of access to a facility amounts to abuse of a dominant position even if the conditions of the essential facilities doctrine are not met (ČSAD Liberec), 6 juin 2005, e-Competitions June 2005, Art. N° 134

Visites 5486

Tous les numéros

  • Latest News issue 
  • Tous les News issues
  • Latest Special issue 
  • Tous les Special issues