The Indian Competition Authority closes a case against a taxi-aggregator finding no abuse of dominance in the market for radio taxi services in Delhi-NCR (Meru Travel Solutions / Uber India)

The CCI closed a case against taxi-aggregator Uber, rejecting arguments by Meru Travel Solutions (Meru) that Uber had abused its dominant position under Section 4 of the Competition Act by resorting to predatory pricing and that exclusivity agreements with its driver partners had an appreciable adverse effect on competition (AAEC) under Section 3(4) of the Competition Act. The CCI followed the investigating Director General (DG) in defining the relevant market for the purposes of

L'accès à cet article est réservé aux abonnés

Déjà abonné ? Identifiez-vous

L’accès à cet article est réservé aux abonnés.

Lire gratuitement un article

Vous pouvez lire cet article gratuitement en vous inscrivant.

 

Version PDF

Auteurs

  • Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas (New Delhi)
  • Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas (New Delhi)
  • Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas (New Delhi)
  • Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas (New Delhi)
  • Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas (New Delhi)
  • Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas (New Delhi)
  • Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas (New Delhi)
  • Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas (Mumbai)
  • Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas (New Delhi)
  • Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas (New Delhi)

Citation

Pallavi Shroff, John Handoll, Naval Satarawala Chopra, Shweta Shroff Chopra, Harman Singh Sandhu, Manika Brar, Aparna Mehra, Gauri Chhabra, Yaman Verma, Rohan Arora, The Indian Competition Authority closes a case against a taxi-aggregator finding no abuse of dominance in the market for radio taxi services in Delhi-NCR (Meru Travel Solutions / Uber India), 17 juillet 2021, e-Competitions July 2021, Art. N° 101952

Visites 229

Tous les numéros

  • Latest News issue 
  • Tous les News issues
  • Latest Special issue 
  • Tous les Special issues