The EU Court of Justice makes a clear distinction between cartel’s restrictive effects on competition and its damaging effects (Kilpailu- ja kuluttajavirasto)

By judgement on the 14th of January 2021 in Case C-450/19, Kilpailu- ja kuluttajavirasto (‘Judgment’), the Court of Justice of the European Union (‘CJEU’) stated that an infringement of Art. 101 TFEU in bid-rigging cases ends with the conclusion of the works, goods or services contract. To reach this conclusion, the CJEU made a distinction between the practices distorting competition and their damaging effects. Although related to public enforcement, the Judgment provides interesting guidelines regarding damage claims. It appears from the judgment that: (i) the EU right to full compensation encompasses harm which materializes after the infringement of Art. 101 TFEU has ended (i.e. lingering or after-effects), (ii) the damaging effects are primarily relevant for limitation periods, not

L'accès à cet article est réservé aux abonnés

Déjà abonné ? Identifiez-vous

L’accès à cet article est réservé aux abonnés.

Lire gratuitement un article

Vous pouvez lire cet article gratuitement en vous inscrivant.

 

Version PDF

Auteurs

  • CDC Cartel Damage Claims (Brussels)
  • CDC Cartel Damage Claims (Brussels)

Citation

Juraj Siska, Vasil Savov, The EU Court of Justice makes a clear distinction between cartel’s restrictive effects on competition and its damaging effects (Kilpailu- ja kuluttajavirasto), 14 janvier 2021, e-Competitions January 2021, Art. N° 99171

Visites 228

Tous les numéros

  • Latest News issue 
  • Tous les News issues
  • Latest Special issue 
  • Tous les Special issues