The Paris Court of Appeal confirms that a supplier heading a purely qualitative selective distribution network can refuse a distributor meeting all the network’s selection criteria if the refusal has no anticompetitive object or effect (Mazda / Palau)

In its Mazda ruling of 23 January 2019, the Court of Appeal ("Cour d'Appel") of Paris confirms a developing French case law under which a supplier heading a purely qualitative selective distribution network can refuse to authorize a distributor meeting all the network’s selection criteria, provided that the refusal has no anticompetitive object or effect. Unfortunately, it leaves open the question as to whether this case law applies only to the authorization renewal or expends to its initial granting. On 15 December 2003, the French company Automobiles Palau (hereafter “Palau”) executed two agreements with the French company Mazda Automobiles France (hereafter “Mazda”) under which the former was appointed by the latter to distribute new Mazda cars and provide after-sale services in Bruges

L'accès à cet article est réservé aux abonnés

Déjà abonné ? Identifiez-vous

L’accès à cet article est réservé aux abonnés.

Lire gratuitement un article

Vous pouvez lire cet article gratuitement en vous inscrivant.

 

Version PDF

Auteur

  • Delcade Avocats & Solicitors (Paris)

Citation

Jeremy Bernard, The Paris Court of Appeal confirms that a supplier heading a purely qualitative selective distribution network can refuse a distributor meeting all the network’s selection criteria if the refusal has no anticompetitive object or effect (Mazda / Palau), 23 janvier 2019, e-Competitions January 2019, Art. N° 89907

Visites 226

Tous les numéros

  • Latest News issue 
  • Tous les News issues
  • Latest Special issue 
  • Tous les Special issues