The US Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit affirms judgment that incompatibility of products did not constitute monopolization on the market for pulse oximetry monitors (Tyco Health)

U.S. 9th Circuit affirms judgment that incompatibility of products did not constitute monopolization* On 6 January 2010 the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit affirmed a U.S. District Court (Central District of California) grant of summary judgment on a monopoly maintenance claim brought against Tyco Health Care Group LP (“Tyco”). The claim was based on Tyco

L'accès à cet article est réservé aux abonnés

Déjà abonné ? Identifiez-vous

L’accès à cet article est réservé aux abonnés.

Lire gratuitement un article

Vous pouvez lire cet article gratuitement en vous inscrivant.

 

Version PDF

Auteur

  • Stanford University - Stanford Law School

Citation

Juha Vesala, The US Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit affirms judgment that incompatibility of products did not constitute monopolization on the market for pulse oximetry monitors (Tyco Health), 6 janvier 2010, e-Competitions January 2010, Art. N° 59616

Visites 153

Tous les numéros

  • Latest News issue 
  • Tous les News issues
  • Latest Special issue 
  • Tous les Special issues