The Turkish Competition Authority finds no-poaching clauses in a gym company’s franchising agreements to be against competition law (BFIT)

This case summary includes an analysis of Turkish Competition Board’s (the “Board”) BFIT preliminary investigation decision (07.02.2019, 19-06/64-27) in which the Board evaluated non-compete and no-poaching obligations imposed by Bfit Sağlık ve Spor Yatırım ve Tic. A.Ş. (“BFIT”) to its franchisees. Accordingly, the Board concluded not to launch an investigation against BFIT and ordered BFIT to terminate the infringement under Article 9/3 of Law No. 4054 on the Protection of Competition (“Law No. 4054”). The Board stated that BFIT has to revise non-compete and no-poaching clauses to comply with Law No. 4054 and Block Exemption Communiqué on Vertical Agreements (“Communiqué No. 2002/2”). Background BFIT provides right to use its trademark to franchisees to open gyms, via franchising agreements. Under

L'accès à cet article est réservé aux abonnés

Déjà abonné ? Identifiez-vous

L’accès à cet article est réservé aux abonnés.

Lire gratuitement un article

Vous pouvez lire cet article gratuitement en vous inscrivant.

 

Version PDF

Auteurs

Citation

Ceren Özkanlı Samlı, Gönenç Gürkaynak, The Turkish Competition Authority finds no-poaching clauses in a gym company’s franchising agreements to be against competition law (BFIT), 7 février 2019, e-Competitions February 2019, Art. N° 90902

Visites 355

Tous les numéros

  • Latest News issue 
  • Tous les News issues
  • Latest Special issue 
  • Tous les Special issues