The US Supreme Court narrows "State-Action" doctrine in hospital merger challenged by the US FTC (Phoebe Putney)

In a unanimous decision issued on February 19, 2013, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the state-action doctrine did not immunize Phoebe Putney Health System's acquisition of Palmyra Park Hospital in Albany, Georgia [1]. The decision immediately was hailed by FTC Chairman Jon Leibowitz as "a big victory for consumers who want to see lower health care costs" and one that "will ensure competition in a variety of other industries, as well". This ruling both clarifies the standards needed to establish state-action immunity, while raising questions about what evidence will meet these standards. Phoebe arose out of the merger between two hospitals, Phoebe Putney Memorial Hospital

L'accès à cet article est réservé aux abonnés

Déjà abonné ? Identifiez-vous

L’accès à cet article est réservé aux abonnés.

Lire gratuitement un article

Vous pouvez lire cet article gratuitement en vous inscrivant.

 

Version PDF

Auteurs

  • Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom (New York)
  • Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom (Palo Alto)
  • Clifford Chance (Washington D.C.)
  • Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom (Palo Alto)

Citation

Clifford H. Aronson, Alec Y. Chang, Sharis A. Pozen, Joanna Warren, The US Supreme Court narrows "State-Action" doctrine in hospital merger challenged by the US FTC (Phoebe Putney), 19 février 2013, e-Competitions February 2013, Art. N° 51325

Visites 327

Tous les numéros

  • Latest News issue 
  • Tous les News issues
  • Latest Special issue 
  • Tous les Special issues