The US Supreme Court limits state-action immunity in hospital merger (Phoebe Putney Health System)

On February 19, 2013, the Supreme Court visited a corner of the antitrust map that it last glimpsed during the Reagan Administration—the state action doctrine. The case that prompted this sojourn, FTC v. Phoebe Putney Health System, Inc. [1], arose when a hospital authority in Albany-Dougherty County, Georgia attempted to acquire the only other hospital that provided acute-care services in the county. The Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) challenged the merger, claiming that it would enable the hospital authority to raise prices for such services, but saw its case rebuffed when lower courts held that the state action doctrine shielded the hospital authority’s decision from antitrust scrutiny. A unanimous Supreme Court reversed, holding that there was no “affirmative evidence” that the State

L'accès à cet article est réservé aux abonnés

Déjà abonné ? Identifiez-vous

L’accès à cet article est réservé aux abonnés.

Lire gratuitement un article

Vous pouvez lire cet article gratuitement en vous inscrivant.

 

Version PDF

Auteurs

  • Paul Hastings (San Francisco)
  • Paul Hastings (San Francisco)

Citation

Thomas P. Brown, Emily Dodds Powell, The US Supreme Court limits state-action immunity in hospital merger (Phoebe Putney Health System), 19 février 2013, e-Competitions February 2013, Art. N° 74730

Visites 133

Tous les numéros

  • Latest News issue 
  • Tous les News issues
  • Latest Special issue 
  • Tous les Special issues