The US Supreme Court decides a case interpreting the doctrine of state action immunity from federal antitrust liability (Phoebe Putney Health System)

I. The State Action Doctrine State Action immunity from the application of U.S. antitrust law was established by the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Parker v. Brown [1]. Based on principles of federalism and deference to state powers to structure their own economic policy, the doctrine allows states and certain non-state actors to escape the restrictions imposed by federal antitrust law [2]. In Parkerthe Court held that “nothing in the language of the Sherman Act or in its history” suggested that Congress intended to restrict the sovereign capacity of the states to regulate their economies. The federal antitrust laws should not be read to bar States from imposing market restraints “as an act of government” [3]. While this protection was originally established for state actors, the

L'accès à cet article est réservé aux abonnés

Déjà abonné ? Identifiez-vous

L’accès à cet article est réservé aux abonnés.

Lire gratuitement un article

Vous pouvez lire cet article gratuitement en vous inscrivant.

 

Version PDF

Auteurs

  • University of Indiana
  • University of Indiana - Maurer School of Law (Indianapolis)

Citation

Max Huffman, Evan Bartel, The US Supreme Court decides a case interpreting the doctrine of state action immunity from federal antitrust liability (Phoebe Putney Health System), 19 février 2013, e-Competitions February 2013, Art. N° 51458

Visites 360

Tous les numéros

  • Latest News issue 
  • Tous les News issues
  • Latest Special issue 
  • Tous les Special issues