The EU Court of Justice upholds that a regulation introducing a system of compulsory training for chartered accountants may fall within the scope of the interdiction in Article 101(1) TFEU (OTOC)

Anticompetitive behaviour by professional regulators – Wouters naturalised* The ECJ’s judgment in Case C-309/99 Wouters – that the Dutch legal regulator was an association of undertakings for the purposes of competition law, but that its prohibition on partnerships between lawyers and accountants nevertheless fell outside Article 101(1) having regard to its context and objectives – was a controversial one. To some it suggested the emergence in European competition law of a “rule of reason”. Professor Whish preferred to treat it as an example of a standalone doctrine of “regulatory ancillarity” that enabled the courts to overlook the incidentally anticompetitive effects of primarily regulatory measures. Whatever the explanation, it was clear that the ECJ had introduced a doctrine which cut

L'accès à cet article est réservé aux abonnés

Déjà abonné ? Identifiez-vous

L’accès à cet article est réservé aux abonnés.

Lire gratuitement un article

Vous pouvez lire cet article gratuitement en vous inscrivant.

 

Version PDF

Auteur

  • Blackstone Chambers (London)

Citation

Tom Cleaver, The EU Court of Justice upholds that a regulation introducing a system of compulsory training for chartered accountants may fall within the scope of the interdiction in Article 101(1) TFEU (OTOC), 28 février 2013, e-Competitions February 2013, Art. N° 61873

Visites 72

Tous les numéros

  • Latest News issue 
  • Tous les News issues
  • Latest Special issue 
  • Tous les Special issues