The US Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit holds that a seller’s discount program that is available to competing purchasers does not violate the Robinson-Patman Act (Smith Wholesale / R.J.R Tobacco)

The Robinson-Patman Act has given rise to some truly awful court decisions that have created a seller-buyer environment of sometimes unforgiving price rigidity, as well as complex and difficult-to-comply-with principles about when and to whom sellers must offer price discounts and nonprice promotions. For example: Unlike any other antitrust statute, the Robinson-Patman Act can be violated merely upon proof of a « reasonable possibility » that competition between two buyers might be impaired (the Morton Salt standard). The old Fred Meyer case requires sellers to offer promotions to entities that do not buy from the sellers and with whom the sellers may not even want to have a relationship. The meeting competition defense (which allows a seller to lower its price to a buyer in a

L'accès à cet article est réservé aux abonnés

Déjà abonné ? Identifiez-vous

L’accès à cet article est réservé aux abonnés.

Lire gratuitement un article

Vous pouvez lire cet article gratuitement en vous inscrivant.

 

Version PDF

Auteurs

Citation

Michelle K. Fischer, Thomas Demitrack, The US Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit holds that a seller’s discount program that is available to competing purchasers does not violate the Robinson-Patman Act (Smith Wholesale / R.J.R Tobacco), 21 février 2007, e-Competitions February 2007, Art. N° 33825

Visites 824

Tous les numéros

  • Latest News issue 
  • Tous les News issues
  • Latest Special issue 
  • Tous les Special issues