The US Supreme Court extends monopoly predatory pricing standards to monopsony predatory bidding practices (Weyerhaeuser / Ross-Simmons)

On February 20, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a significant opinion in which it concluded that the test it had set forth previously to govern predatory pricing cases applies also to cases involving allegations of predatory bidding. See Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Ross-Simmons Hardwood Lumber Co., Inc., 2007 WL 505794 (U.S. Feb. 20, 2007). Section 2 of the Sherman Act prohibits companies with a dominant market presence from engaging in anticompetitive and exclusionary behavior to further consolidate or maintain their power. Although difficult to prove under the requirements set forth by the Court in Brooke Group Ltd. v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 509 U.S. 209 (1993), predatory pricing is considered to

L'accès à cet article est réservé aux abonnés

Déjà abonné ? Identifiez-vous

L’accès à cet article est réservé aux abonnés.

Lire gratuitement un article

Vous pouvez lire cet article gratuitement en vous inscrivant.

 

Version PDF

Auteurs

  • Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom (Washington DC)
  • Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom (New York)

Citation

Steven C. Sunshine, Shepard Goldfein, The US Supreme Court extends monopoly predatory pricing standards to monopsony predatory bidding practices (Weyerhaeuser / Ross-Simmons), 20 février 2007, e-Competitions February 2007, Art. N° 45597

Visites 258

Tous les numéros

  • Latest News issue 
  • Tous les News issues
  • Latest Special issue 
  • Tous les Special issues