The Italian Supreme Administrative Court addresses the differences between the notions of service concession and public procurement of services (Università degli Studi di Roma Tre v International Airport System)

KEYWORDS
Reference
Italian Supreme Administrative Court (Consiglio di Stato, Sect. VI), 4 september 2012, judgement n. 4682, Università degli Studi di Roma Tre c. IAS - International Airport System s.r.l.

I. Introduction The judgment of the Italian Consiglio di Stato addresses once more the differences between the notions of service concession and public procurement of services. These main differences, as set up by several ECJ's sentences, consist in the different allocation of economic risk and in the different regime of liability. The other main issue highlighted in this case is the publicity of the contract notice and his effects on the participation and on the rules of competition. As well known a legal definition of service concession has already been provided by the EU law [1], nonetheless a new directive on concessions is right now at discussion for a further harmonization of the different legal concepts of concession in the Member States [2]. II. The facts of University

L'accès à cet article est réservé aux abonnés

Déjà abonné ? Identifiez-vous

L’accès à cet article est réservé aux abonnés.

Lire gratuitement un article

Vous pouvez lire cet article gratuitement en vous inscrivant.

 

Version PDF

Auteur

Citation

Gabriella Racca, The Italian Supreme Administrative Court addresses the differences between the notions of service concession and public procurement of services (Università degli Studi di Roma Tre v International Airport System), 26 décembre 2012, e-Competitions December 2012, Art. N° 50290

Visites 249

Tous les numéros

  • Latest News issue 
  • Tous les News issues
  • Latest Special issue 
  • Tous les Special issues