The US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirms dismissal of antitrust claims addressing the proper application of the implied preclusion doctrine (Electronic Trading Group / Banc of America Securities)

On December 3, 2009, in In re Short Sale Antitrust Litigation (No. 08-0420-cv), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed the dismissal of a putative class action alleging collusion among certain financial institutions that serve as “prime brokers” in connection with short sale transactions. [1] Plaintiff-appellant Electronic Trading Group, LLC (ETG), a short seller, alleged that prime brokers arbitrarily had designated certain securities as “hard-to-borrow” and then fixed the price for borrowing them in violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1. The district court had dismissed the complaint on the grounds that antitrust liability was impliedly precluded by the federal securities laws based on the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Credit Suisse

L'accès à cet article est réservé aux abonnés

Déjà abonné ? Identifiez-vous

L’accès à cet article est réservé aux abonnés.

Lire gratuitement un article

Vous pouvez lire cet article gratuitement en vous inscrivant.

 

Version PDF

Auteurs

  • Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom (New York)
  • Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom (New York)

Citation

Paul M.  Eckles, Shepard Goldfein, The US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirms dismissal of antitrust claims addressing the proper application of the implied preclusion doctrine (Electronic Trading Group / Banc of America Securities), 3 décembre 2009, e-Competitions December 2009, Art. N° 45540

Visites 169

Tous les numéros

  • Latest News issue 
  • Tous les News issues
  • Latest Special issue 
  • Tous les Special issues