The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit finds that antitrust liability can attach to sham administrative petitions and that the sham litigation exception is not limited to court litigation (Tyco Healthcare / Mutual Pharmaceutical)

Addressing whether the “sham” exception to Noerr-Pennington immunity is limited to sham litigation in courts, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit vacated a lower court’s summary judgment of no antitrust liability, finding that antitrust liability can attach to sham administrative petitions and that the sham litigation exception is not limited to court litigation. Tyco Healthcare Group LP v. Mutual Pharm. Co., Inc., Case No. 13-1386 (Fed. Cir., Aug. 6, 2014) (Bryson, J.) (Newman, J., dissenting). Tyco

L'accès à cet article est réservé aux abonnés

Déjà abonné ? Identifiez-vous

L’accès à cet article est réservé aux abonnés.

Lire gratuitement un article

Vous pouvez lire cet article gratuitement en vous inscrivant.

 

Version PDF

Auteur

  • McDermott Will & Emery (Paris)

Citation

Jacques Buhart, The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit finds that antitrust liability can attach to sham administrative petitions and that the sham litigation exception is not limited to court litigation (Tyco Healthcare / Mutual Pharmaceutical), 6 août 2014, e-Competitions August 2014, Art. N° 93074

Visites 30

Tous les numéros

  • Latest News issue 
  • Tous les News issues
  • Latest Special issue 
  • Tous les Special issues