The Shanghai Higher Court and one of China’s antitrust regulators issue decisions that resale price maintenance violated China’s Anti-Monopoly Law (Rainbow / Johnson & Johnson)

This article has been nominated for the 2014 Antitrust Writing Awards. Click here to learn more about the Antitrust Writing Awards.

Within the same week, the Shanghai Higher Court and one of China’s antitrust antitrust regulators have issued decisions that resale price maintenance ("RPM") violated China’s Anti-Monopoly Law ("AML"). The decision of the Shanghai Higher Court involved an agreement between Johnson & Johnson ("J&J") and a distributor, prohibiting the resale of J&J products below a certain price. This decision was followed by the largest set of antitrust fines to date for RPM violations, imposed by the National Development and Reform Commission ("NDRC"), one of China’s antitrust agencies. Read together, the Court decision and NDRC’s recent RPM enforcement actions indicate that, although RPM technically is subject to a rule of reason analysis, courts and regulators in China are reluctant to

L'accès à cet article est réservé aux abonnés

Déjà abonné ? Identifiez-vous

L’accès à cet article est réservé aux abonnés.

Lire gratuitement un article

Vous pouvez lire cet article gratuitement en vous inscrivant.

 

Version PDF

Auteurs

Citation

Peter J. Wang, Sébastien J. Evrard, Yizhe Zhang, Baohui Zhang, The Shanghai Higher Court and one of China’s antitrust regulators issue decisions that resale price maintenance violated China’s Anti-Monopoly Law (Rainbow / Johnson & Johnson), 1er août 2013, e-Competitions August 2013, Art. N° 66635

Visites 169

Tous les numéros

  • Latest News issue 
  • Tous les News issues
  • Latest Special issue 
  • Tous les Special issues