The US Supreme Court holds that Section 13(b) of the FTC Act does not authorize the Federal Trade Commission to seek, or a court to award, equitable monetary relief such as restitution or disgorgement (AMG Capital Management)

On April 22, 2021, the Supreme Court unanimously held that section 13(b) of the Federal Trade Commission Act - which authorizes “a permanent injunction”- does not authorize the Federal Trade Commission to seek, or a court to award, equitable monetary relief such as restitution or disgorgement. See AMG Capital Management, LLC v. Federal Trade Commission, No. 19-508 (U.S. April 22, 2021). Instead, the Court held that to obtain equitable monetary

L'accès à cet article est réservé aux abonnés

Déjà abonné ? Identifiez-vous

L’accès à cet article est réservé aux abonnés.

Lire gratuitement un article

Vous pouvez lire cet article gratuitement en vous inscrivant.

 

Version PDF

Auteurs

  • Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton (Washington)
  • Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton (Washington)

Citation

Bruce Hoffman, Kenneth Reinker, The US Supreme Court holds that Section 13(b) of the FTC Act does not authorize the Federal Trade Commission to seek, or a court to award, equitable monetary relief such as restitution or disgorgement (AMG Capital Management), 22 avril 2021, e-Competitions April 2021, Art. N° 100680

Visites 161

Tous les numéros

  • Latest News issue 
  • Tous les News issues
  • Latest Special issue 
  • Tous les Special issues