The EU Court of Justice confirms the limitations that apply before courts are able to classify anticompetitive agreements as a restriction of competition by object under Art 101 TFEU in a multilateral interchange fee credit card transaction (Budapest Bank)

On 2 April 2020, the European Court of Justice ("ECJ") delivered its judgment in Budapest Bank on a reference for a preliminary ruling from Hungary's highest court. The judgment confirms the important limitations that apply before competition authorities and courts are able classify anticompetitive agreements as a restriction of competition "by object" under Article 101 TFEU. The background to the case arises from a 2009 finding by the Hungarian competition authority that 22 banks, as well as Visa and Mastercard, had breached Article 101 TFEU by entering into an anticompetitive agreement to establish a uniform interchange fee for card payments (the "MIF Agreement"). The national competition authority ("NCA") found that the agreement had both the object and effect of restricting

L'accès à cet article est réservé aux abonnés

Déjà abonné ? Identifiez-vous

L’accès à cet article est réservé aux abonnés.

Lire gratuitement un article

Vous pouvez lire cet article gratuitement en vous inscrivant.

 

Version PDF

Auteurs

Citation

Duncan Liddell, Alexi Dimitriou, Donald Slater, Denis Fosselard, The EU Court of Justice confirms the limitations that apply before courts are able to classify anticompetitive agreements as a restriction of competition by object under Art 101 TFEU in a multilateral interchange fee credit card transaction (Budapest Bank), 2 avril 2020, e-Competitions April 2020, Art. N° 94633

Visites 97

Tous les numéros

  • Latest News issue 
  • Tous les News issues
  • Latest Special issue 
  • Tous les Special issues