The EU Court of Justice upholds use of evidence from a national authority other than a member state competition authority (Pacific Fruit)

The European Court of Justice ("CoJ") has upheld the European Commission's use of evidence transmitted by a national authority other than a Member State competition authority in a cartel investigation. The CoJ ruled on April 27, 2017, that the national authority properly transmitted such evidence under national law and that, in particular, nothing under EU competition rules impeded such transfer (Case C-469/15 P, FSL Holdings NV, Firma Léon Van Parys NV, and Pacific Fruit Company Italy SpA ("Pacific Fruit Group") v. European Commission). Background This ruling arises from the Commission's investigation of anticompetitive practices relating to the exchange of price-related information of bananas in northern Europe (northern European investigation), commenced in 2005. In the context

L'accès à cet article est réservé aux abonnés

Déjà abonné ? Identifiez-vous

L’accès à cet article est réservé aux abonnés.

Lire gratuitement un article

Vous pouvez lire cet article gratuitement en vous inscrivant.

 

Version PDF

Auteurs

  • Jones Day (Brussels)
  • Jones Day (Brussels)
  • Jones Day (Brussels)

Citation

Bernard Amory, Charlotte Breuvart, Cecelia Kye, The EU Court of Justice upholds use of evidence from a national authority other than a member state competition authority (Pacific Fruit), 27 avril 2017, e-Competitions April 2017, Art. N° 84423

Visites 157

Tous les numéros

  • Latest News issue 
  • Tous les News issues
  • Latest Special issue 
  • Tous les Special issues