The US District Court for the Western District of Washington issues first analysis of an appropriate royalty that a patentee could obtain after promising to license its patent on reasonable and nondiscriminatory (RAND) terms (Microsoft / Motorola)

On April 25, 2013, Judge James L. Robart of the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington offered the first analysis by a U.S. court of an appropriate royalty that a patentee could obtain after promising to license its patent on reasonable and nondiscriminatory (RAND) terms. Microsoft had sued Motorola for breach of contract, claiming that Motorola had breached its RAND obligation through two offer letters that (in seeking 2.25% of the net selling price of end products) would have required Microsoft to pay $4 billion. In an exhaustive, 207-page opinion, Judge Robart constructed a framework for determining an appropriate RAND rate and applied it to reach a result that, according to Microsoft, would require it to pay only $1.8 million. Standard-Setting Organizations and

L'accès à cet article est réservé aux abonnés

Déjà abonné ? Identifiez-vous

L’accès à cet article est réservé aux abonnés.

Lire gratuitement un article

Vous pouvez lire cet article gratuitement en vous inscrivant.

 

Version PDF

Auteur

Citation

Michael A. Carrier, The US District Court for the Western District of Washington issues first analysis of an appropriate royalty that a patentee could obtain after promising to license its patent on reasonable and nondiscriminatory (RAND) terms (Microsoft / Motorola), 25 avril 2013, e-Competitions April 2013, Art. N° 51803

Visites 434

Tous les numéros

  • Latest News issue 
  • Tous les News issues
  • Latest Special issue 
  • Tous les Special issues