Soumya Hariharan

Trilegal (Mumbai)
Regulatory Lawyer

Soumya Hariharan specialises in all aspects of competition law and regularly advises Indian and global companies in their most challenging competition law matters before the Competition Commission of India (CCI), including the office of the Director General (DG) and various Courts in India. Her multi-jurisdictional work experience includes working on competition law matters across India, Singapore and the ASEAN region. Soumya has been recognized as a Notable Practitioner in competition law in India by International Financial Law Review (IFLR) 1000, consecutively for the years 2020 and 2019. She has previously worked at Trilegal, AZB & Partners, Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas, Amarchand & Mangaldas & Suresh A Shroff & Co, and Rodyk & Davidson.

Auteurs associés

Trilegal (Mumbai)
Trilegal (Mumbai)
Chandhiok & Associates (New Delhi)
Trilegal (Bangalore)
Trilegal (Mumbai)

Articles

2565 Bulletin

Sakshi Agarwal, Soumya Hariharan, Simar Bindra The Indian Competition Authority dismisses cartel allegations against 19 importers of phenol on account of the absence of conclusive evidence to establish collusion (Sachin Chemicals / Deepak Phenolics / Chokshi Chem / Chemtrade Overseas / Yug...)

139

The Competition Commission of India (CCI) dismissed allegations of cartelization against 19 importers of phenol, on account of absence of conclusive evidence to establish collusion. The CCI held that mere price parallelism does not amount to cartelisation and closed the case. Significantly, the (...)

Akrathi Shetty, Sakshi Agarwal, Soumya Hariharan The Indian Competition Authority finds four automotive and industrial bearing companies to have engaged in price-fixing and directs them to cease and desist from their collusive behaviour (Schaeffler / SKF / NEI / Tata)

226

The Competition Commission of India (CCI) recently found National Engineering Industries Ltd. (NEI), Schaeffler India Ltd. (Schaeffler), SKF India Ltd. (SKF) and Tata Steel Ltd., Bearing Division (Tata) (collectively, OPs) to have collusively fixed the prices of automotive and industrial (...)

Soumya Hariharan, Nandita Sahai, Sakshi Agarwal The Indian Competition Authority orders an investigation against online travel agencies for possible abuse of dominance and for imposing vertical restrictions (Federation of Hotel & Restaurant Associations of India / MMT-Go)

917

Introduction The Federation of Hotel & Restaurant Associations of India (Informant), an association of hotels and restaurants in India, filed an Information with the Competition Commission of India (CCI) against MakeMyTrip India Pvt. Ltd. (MMT), Ibibo Group Private Limited (GoIbibo), (...)

Sakshi Agarwal, Nandita Sahai, Soumya Hariharan The Indian Competition Authority fines companies for bid-rigging regarding a tender for the selection of an agency to carry-out tree census (Nagrik Chetna Manch / SAAR / CADD / Pentacle / Pune)

370

The Competition Commission of India (CCI) recently found that SAAR IT Resources Private Limited (OP 1), CADD Systems and Services Private Limited (OP 2) and Pentacle Consultants (I) Private Limited (OP 3), collusively manipulated the process of bidding, by rigging the bids for the tender (...)

Soumya Hariharan, Nandita Sahai, Sakshi Agarwal The High Court of Delhi holds that the absence of a judicial member does not invalidate proceeding and orders passed by the Competition Commission of India (Cadd)

446

The Hon’ble High Court of Delhi (Delhi HC) recently held that orders passed and proceedings held by the Competition Commission of India (CCI) in the absence of a judicial Member cannot be invalidated. This decision of the Delhi HC abundantly clarifies that orders passed by the CCI in competition (...)

2413 Revue

Envoyer un message