Richard Whish
King’s College (London)
Solicitor, Author
Richard Whish is Emeritus Professor of Law at King’s College London ; in 2014 he was appointed QC Honoris Causa. He was a non-executive director of the Office of Fair Trading in the UK from 2003 to 2009, and a non-executive director of the Singaporean Energy Markets Authority from 2005 to 2011. He is the co-author, with David Bailey, of Competition Law, 9th edition 2018 (OUP), and the author of many other books, articles, case-notes and book reviews on various aspects of international competition law and policy. The "Richard Whish Liber Amicorum" highlights the global reach of Professor Whish’s influence.
Auteurs associés
Benjamin Bowling
King’s College (London)
Gillian Douglas
King’s College (London)
Alison Jones
King’s College (London)
William E. Kovacic
United Kingdom’s Competition Authority - CMA (London)
Renato Nazzini
King’s College (London)
16846 | Conférences
Articles
49225 Bulletin
3405
In this case the Maltese Commission had to decide whether the fact that the Electronics Communications Authority of Malta had a regulatory jurisdiction in relation to various telecommunications services in Malta prevented the Office of Fair Competition from investigating a complaint by Vodafone (...)
3404
This preliminary judgement was brought about after the telecommunications undertaking that was subjected to the investigations of the Director of Fair Trading, hereinafter referred to as the “Director” (based on the Malta Competition Act), protested and held that he was precluded from doing so. (...)
3954
Competition law controls the anti-competitive agreements and the abusive behaviour of undertakings, but much anti-competitive behaviour is caused by the state. Complainants are often frustrated when they discover that the conduct of which they complain is attributable to the state acting in its (...)
3456
This decision concerns the request for the granting of an individual exemption (based on the Malta Competition Act) of certain ingrained anti-competitive practices carried out by the applicant co-operative in the funeral transport market. After a detailed examination of the essential requites (...)
2473
In this case, the Maltese Commission for Fair Trading reached again the conclusion that there had been an infringement of the Competition Act. It concluded that the General Soft Drinks Co (’GSD’) had abused a dominant position in the market for one-litre bottles of carbonated soft drinks by (...)
3548
If there is one activity, above all, that competition law should combat, it is the horizontal cartel : firms that should, in a market-based economy, compete with one another for business should not be able to cooperate with one another, for example by fixing prices, sharing markets and (...)
2644
The decision concerns a circular issued by the applicant company to entrepreneurs who participate in the fairs and exhibitions it organizes. The specific issue raised concerned the granting of the right of preference to past exhibitors on the basis that these would have already invested in the (...)
3230
This case can be regarded as a landmark in the evolution of competition law in Malta : for the first time the Commission handed down a judgment in which it found that an infringement of the Competition Act had been committed. The Commission held that Malta Dairy Products Ltd (’MDPL’) held a (...)
3054
The General Retailers and Traders Union was concerned about the effect of a series of acquisitions of popular supermarkets in Malta by operators already involved in the same sector : could this be detrimental to other players in the market ? In other words, the issue was one of concentration at (...)
3491
The complainant operated a newsagency in the Departure Lounge at Malta International Airport. When the Airport Authority invited tenders for new leases of premises at the airport, the complainant enjoyed a right of first refusal. However, the dominant importer of newspapers and periodicals, (...)
2660
In the present case the Maltese Office of Fair Competition had received a complaint in June 1996 concerning the sale of cigarettes through automatic vending machines. The Office investigated the complaint, and concluded that there was no infringement of the 1994 Act with the result that the (...)
2470
The purpose of competition law is to enhance consumer welfare : the most obvious infringement of the law is a horizontal agreement whereby the members of a cartel impose higher prices on their customers. However, many cases do not fit this fact pattern : often one of the parties to an (...)
2484
This decision concerns a request for the granting of an individual exemption (based on the Malta Competition Act) concerning various exclusivity agreements that the local manufacturer of Coca-Cola had entered into with a considerable number of outlets. It is also to be noted that this request (...)
2568
The merits examined here are identical to those relative to Request Number 1 of 1997. To avoid useless repetition reference is made to the decision following that request.
2771
The decision concerns a request for the granting of an individual exemption (based on the Malta Competition Act) to agreements already entered into by applicant company binding resellers of its products. The request centred around the fact that the termination of these agreements was going to (...)
3613
The first judgment of the Commission concerned the price of beer. This case was brought under section 11 of the Competition Act, as originally drafted, under which power existed to regulate the price of ’essential’ products. This provision was not without controversy. In a competition-based (...)
17094 Revue
348
Cette rubrique recense et commente les ouvrages et autres publications en droit de la concurrence, droit & économie de la concurrence et en droit de la régulation. Une telle recension ne peut par nature être exhaustive et se limite donc à présenter quelques publications récentes dans ces (...)
2652
De nombreuses questions ont été examinées par la Commission maltaise durant les dix premières années de la Loi maltaise sur la concurrence, aussi bien au niveau du fond que de la procédure. La confrontation de l’économie maltaise et des parties intéressées à un droit de la concurrence renforcé n’a pas (...)
1851
La quatrième table-ronde de la conférence New Frontiers of Antitrust du 10 février 2012 à Paris était dédiée à la distinction entre objet et effet anticoncurrentiel. Richard Whish, Professeur au King’s College de Londres, introduit le sujet par quelques observations liminaires. Nicolas Forwood, juge au (...)
12243
Cet article présente les principales options de réforme de l’article 82 CE dans le contexte de la diffusion par la Commission d’un projet de lignes directrices rendues publiques pour consultation début 2006. Les contributions rassemblées permettent de confronter différents points de vue notamment (...)
