Miranda Cole
Covington & Burling (Brussels)
Lawyer (Partner)
Miranda Cole is a partner based in Covington & Burling Brussels office. She practices competition and communications law and policy. Ms. Cole’s competition law expertise encompasses merger control, actions under Articles 101 and 102 TFEU, advisory work and actions before the European courts in Luxembourg. She has particular expertise in advising companies active in the technology and communications sectors. In addition, she has extensive experience in the communications sector, across all aspects of regulation, policy and competition law relating to the sector, and counselling relating to the impact of regulation on transactions. Recent transaction include Facebook’s acquisition of Instagram, and Microsoft’s acquisitions of Nokia’s Devices & Services division and Skype. She has also recently advised a number of technology sector clients in relation to complaints pursuant to Articles 101 and 102 TFEU before the European Commission and Chapters 1 and 2 before the Office of Fair Trading, including Microsoft in its complaint to the European Commission regarding MMI’s actions to injunct the use of standards essential patents, Microsoft in its defense of its software licensing and distribution structure, and Expedia, Trip Advisor and Microsoft in connection with their complaints to the European Commission regarding Google’s conduct in search and related markets.
Distinctions
Auteurs associés
Jérôme Philippe
Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer (Paris)
Laurence Idot
University Paris II Panthéon‑Assas
Marc van der Woude
General Court of the European Union (Luxembourg)
David Spector
Paris School of Economics
Bruno Lasserre
French State Council (Paris)
Frédéric Jenny
ESSEC Business School (Cergy)
Jorge Padilla
Compass Lexecon (Brussels)
Jean-François Bellis
Van Bael & Bellis (Brussels)
12450 | Conférences
Vidéos
Articles
259 Bulletin
74
The UK Court of Appeal Clarifies the Legal Test for Excessive Pricing* Under Article 102 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (“TFEU”), an undertaking may abuse its dominant position by “directly or indirectly imposing unfair purchase or selling prices”. The UK Court of Appeal (...)
59
Under Article 102 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (“TFEU”), an undertaking may abuse its dominant position by “directly or indirectly imposing unfair purchase or selling prices”. The UK Court of Appeal recently provided guidance regarding the legal test to determine whether (...)
12
On 6 December 2017, the Court of Justice of European Union (CJEU) issued its long-awaited Judgment in Coty Germany GmbH v Parfümerie Akzente GmbH. Taking an approach similar to that adopted by Advocate General (AG) Wahl in his Opinion in July, the CJEU found that a supplier of luxury goods may (...)
12
On July 1, 2016, the German Federal Ministry of Economic Affairs and Energy published a proposed draft amendment to the German Act against Restraints of Competition, which would introduce a new merger control notification threshold based on transaction value. The draft (i) introduces a new (...)
7
On September 15, 2016, the European Commission published its Preliminary Report on the ongoing e-commerce sector inquiry. The report is based on the input from nearly 1,800 companies operating in e-commerce of consumer goods and digital content and has analyzed around 8,000 distribution (...)
10
On July 16, 2015, the Court of Justice of the European Union (“CJEU” or “the Court”) issued its long-awaited judgment in Huawei Technology Co. Ltd v ZTE Corp., ZTE Deutschland GmbH. The CJEU found that the holder of a standard essential patent (“SEP”) may, in certain circumstances, abuse its dominant (...)
11
Earlier today, the European Commission (the “EC”) announced the launch of a sector inquiry into the e-commerce sector in the European Union (“EU”). This is the first sector inquiry in the EU since 2008, and is part of the EC’s broader Digital Single Market (“DSM”) Strategy. The Directorate General (...)
9
Earlier today, Vice-President Andrus Ansip (Digital Single Market) unveiled the European Commission’s long-awaited strategy aiming to achieve a single, borderless, European online marketplace and kick-start growth in the European digital economy. The Commission’s roadmap includes several (...)
16
The Reference On 5 April 2013, the Landgericht Düsseldorf referred questions relating to injunctive relief over standard-essential patents (“SEPs”) to the Court of Justice (“CJEU”) in connection with a patent dispute between Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd (“Huawei”) and ZTE Corp., ZTE Deutschland GmbH (...)
11
On 20 June 2013, the European Commission published a consultation paper which proposes a reflexion and seeks comments from stakeholders on two distinct issues in the field of merger control : non-controlling minority shareholdings and the system of case referrals. The Commission raises detailed (...)
13
Private damages claims in the EU are a fact of life these days. As a result of the persistent and creative efforts of claimants, the days when cartel damages were a U.S. aberration of merely potential concern for companies facing cartel charges in the EU are long gone. The silver lining for (...)
11
On 20 February 2013, the European Commission published for consultation its proposal for revisions to the EU technology transfer competition regime. The consultation period runs until 17 May 2013. The new regime will be adopted before April 2014. The EU’s approach to the application of (...)
14
On 20 April 2010, the European Commission published new rules governing so-called “vertical” agreements, such as distribution and supply agreements. The new rules are set out in the Vertical Restraints Block Exemption Regulation and the related Guidelines (see DG Competition’s website). They will (...)
