Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom (New York)

Matthew Martino

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom (New York)
Lawyer (Partner)

In the antitrust area, Mr. Martino has handled a number of litigations involving alleged price-fixing, group boycotts, monopolization, other restraints of trade, and class actions. Mr. Martino represented CEMEX in a class action alleging price-fixing, as well as market and customer allocations. Other representations include, among others, HarperCollins Publishers in the ebooks price-fixing class action litigation ; Pfizer Inc in a class action alleging monopolization with respect to the drug Neurontin ; Ainsworth Lumber Company in an antitrust class action alleging price-fixing in the oriented strand board industry ; and IASIS Healthcare in an antitrust action challenging a series of exclusive contracts. Mr. Martino also provides general antitrust counseling, advising clients on compliance with state and federal antitrust laws, including issues relating to joint ventures, competitor collaborations, unilateral conduct and distribution.

Distinctions

Auteurs associés

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom (New York)
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom (Washington DC)
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom (Washington DC)
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom (Washington DC)

Articles

498 Bulletin

Matthew Martino, Tara L. Reinhart, Steven C. Sunshine, Julia K. York The US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit strikes down sweeping injunction against semiconductor company and reins in expansive interpretation of Sherman Act (Qualcomm)

261

On August 11, 2020, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit decisively reversed the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC or Commission) controversial district court win challenging Qualcomm’s licensing practices. In rejecting every aspect of the lower court’s decision, the Ninth Circuit panel (...)

Matthew Martino, Paul M. Eckles, Tara L. Reinhart The US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit issues a decision holding that purchasers have standing to seek damages from suppliers accused of price-fixing (Processed Egg Products)

237

Last week, in In re : Processed Egg Products Antitrust Litigation, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit issued a decision holding that purchasers of processed egg products have standing to seek damages from egg suppliers accused of price-fixing in violation of Section 1 of the (...)

Envoyer un message