Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton (London)

Fay Davies

Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton (London)
Associate

Fay Davies is an associate with Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton in the United Kingdom since 2018. Her practice focuses on EU and UK competition law, including merger control, anticompetitive agreements, abuse of dominance, and private damages litigation. Her experience includes various sectors, notably consumer goods, entertainment, and digital markets. She holds a law degree from the University of Law, and a Bachelor’s degree from Cambridge University.

Distinctions

Nominee, 2021 Antitrust Writing Awards : Business, Intellectual Property

Contacter

Auteurs associés

Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton (Cologne)
Allemagne 3 contributions 782 visites
Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton (London)
Royaume-Uni 2 contributions 482 visites
Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton (Hong Kong)
Hong Kong 1 contribution 255 visites
Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton (Brussels)
Belgique 1 contribution 334 visites
Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton (Washington)
États-Unis 1 contribution 24 visites

Articles

772 Bulletin

Paul Stuart, Lanto Sheridan, Fay Davies The EU Court of Justice issues a decision on disclosure under the Damages Directive which implies post-Brexit divergence between EU and UK competition damages claims (Paccar / DAF Trucks)

11

On 10 November 2022, the European Court of Justice (CJEU) issued a preliminary ruling on the interpretation of the disclosure obligation under the EU directive that harmonised national rules governing actions for damages for breaches of competition law in EU member states and the UK (the (...)

Nicholas Levy, Paul Gilbert, Lanto Sheridan, Jackie Holland, Fay Davies, Sarah Peel The UK Government consults on its ambitious reform of national competition policy, including on changes to allow the Government to play a more active role in shaping national competition policy and to increase the Competition Authority’s investigative and enforcement powers

299

On 20 July 2021, the UK Government launched its consultation on wide-ranging reforms to “bring [the UK’s] competition and consumer policies into the 21st century” [1] (the “Consultation”). While recognising that the UK’s competition regime “starts from a strong foundation” and “is internationally (...)

Jonathan Kelly, Nicholas Levy, Paul Gilbert, Paul Stuart, Fay Davies The UK Court of Appeal clarifies the ability of parties that settle EU Commission antitrust investigations to challenge the Commission’s findings in follow-on damages actions (Trucks Cartel)

206

The Court of Appeal has handed down an important judgment clarifying the ability of parties that settle European Commission (Commission) antitrust investigations to challenge the Commission’s findings in follow-on damages actions. The judgment concerns an appeal relating to a preliminary issue (...)

Maurits J. F. M. Dolmans, Paul Gilbert, Fay Davies, Thomas Graf, Daniel P. Culley The UK Supreme Court issues its ruling in a standard essential patent litigation and clarifies Courts’ approach to FRAND disputes (Unwired Planet / Huawei)

37

On 26 August 2020, the UK Supreme Court issued its judgment in a standard-essential patent (SEP) dispute between Huawei and Unwired Planet (see full alert memorandum). Unwired Planet is a patent assertion entity that acquires and licenses patents. In 2013, it acquired telecoms patents from (...)

Maurits J. F. M. Dolmans, Paul Gilbert, Fay Davies, Thomas Graf, Daniel P. Culley The UK Supreme Court holds that an English court can enjoin infringement of a UK SEP where the infringer is willing to take a UK license, but refuses to take a worldwide licence on FRAND terms (Huawei / Unwired Planet)

219

This article has been nominated for the 2021 Antitrust Writing Awards. Click here to learn more about the Antitrust Writing Awards. On 26 August, 2020, the UK Supreme Court decided a standard-essential patent (SEP) dispute between Huawei and Unwired Planet. [1] The Supreme Court held that an (...)

Envoyer un message