Van Bael & Bellis (Brussels)

Francesco Pili

Van Bael & Bellis (Brussels)
Lawyer (Associate)

Francesco Pilli focuses on EU and Italian competition law as well as EU and international trade law. Prior to joining Van Bael & Bellis, Francesco worked as a référendaire in the Chambers of the then Vice-President of the European Court of Justice, Prof. Antonio Tizzano, where he gained experience in the fields of EU procedural and substantive law across a wide array of areas, including antitrust and State aid law, data protection, access to documents, free movement rules and fundamental rights. He was also responsible for several interim measures proceedings in the fields of EU public procurement law and REACH. In addition, Francesco is also active in the academic field. He has authored and contributed to several academic works and delivers guest lectures in the field of EU law.

Auteurs associés

Van Bael & Bellis (Brussels)
Van Bael & Bellis (Brussels)
Van Bael & Bellis (Brussels)

Articles

880 Bulletin

Francesco Pili, Markus Wellinger The EU Court of Justice clarifies the concept of “State resources” with regard to financial contributions collected by an authorized private eco-body (Eco TLC)

22

On 21 October 2020, the Court of Justice answered a request for a preliminary ruling made by the French Conseil d’État (“Council of State”), which raised interesting questions with regard to the notion of “State resources” within the meaning of Article 107(1) TFEU. The background of the case (...)

Francesco Pili, Markus Wellinger The EU Court of Justice Advocate General Kokott criticizes the Commission’s approach to progressive taxation in Poland and suggests that the Court dismiss the appeal (Commission / Poland)

32

On 15 October 2020, Advocate General Kokott delivered her opinion in Case C-562/19 P, Commission v Poland, concerning the appeal of the General Court’s judgment of 16 May 2019 (Joined Cases T-836/16 and T-624/17). The judgment under appeal annulled the Commissions’ decision to open a formal State (...)

Francesco Pili, Markus Wellinger The EU General Court provides additional guidance on the scope of the presumption of advantage granted by State guarantees (IFPEN)

24

On 5 October 2020, the General Court delivered another important judgment in the so-called EPIC saga – where “EPIC” is a French acronym standing for “Établissement Public à caractère Industriel et Commercial” (“Publicly owned industrial and commercial establishment”). The EPICs came under the (...)

Markus Wellinger, Francesco Pili The EU Court of Justice clarifies the scope for State aid rules in the nuclear energy sector covered by the Euratom Treaty, as well as their relationship with the general principles of environmental law (Hinkley Point C)

64

On 22 September 2020, the Grand Chamber of the Court of Justice (the “Court”) dismissed the appeal brought by Austria against the judgment of the General Court (case T-356/15) that rejected its application for annulment against Commission Decision (EU) 2015/658 of 8 October 2014 on the aid (...)

Markus Wellinger, Francesco Pili The EU Commission adopts guidelines on State aid measures in the context of the system for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading post-2021

33

On 21 September 2020, the Commission published new Guidelines on certain State aid measures in the context of the system for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading post-2021 (the “Guidelines”). These Guidelines follow the European Green Deal Communication adopted in 2019 (11.12.2019, COM(2019) (...)

Markus Wellinger, Francesco Pili The EU Court of Justice clarifies some aspects of State aid related to social security contributions (Ministre de l’Agriculture et de l’Alimentation / Compagnie de pêche de Saint-Malo)

92

On 17 September 2020, the Court of Justice (the “ECJ” or “Court”) answered several questions raised by a request for a preliminary ruling from the French Conseil d’État, with regard to the interpretation of Commission Decision 2005/239/EC (the “Decision at issue”). This Decision concerned certain aid (...)

Markus Wellinger, Francesco Pili The EU Court of Justice narrows down the concept of “undertaking” with regard to health insurance bodies (Dôvera zdravotná poistʼovňa)

64

The Court of Justice of the European Union’s (the “Court of Justice”) judgment of 11 June 2020, Commission v. Dôvera zdravotná poistʼovňa is another brick in the case law concerning the concept of “undertaking” with regard to health insurance bodies. The background of the case is a Slovak compulsory (...)

Markus Wellinger, Francesco Pili The EU Court of Justice clarifies the conditions governing the legality of an injunction issued at the same time as a decision to open a formal State aid investigation (Hungary / Commission)

34

On 4 June 2020, the Court of Justice of the European Union (the “Court of Justice”) delivered an important judgment clarifying the conditions under which the European Commission (the “Commission”) can issue an injunction on the basis of Article 11 of the former State aid procedural Regulation No (...)

Aldo Scalini, Fabrizio Di Gianni, Francesco Pili The Italian Government adopts a decree laying down additional measures to support companies negatively affected by the economic consequences of the COVID-19 outbreak

147

On 6 April 2020, the Italian Government adopted a Law Decree (so-called “Decreto Liquidità”) laying down additional measures to support companies negatively affected by the economic consequences of the Covid-19 outbreak. These measures aim at alleviating the devastating effects of the outbreak on (...)

Envoyer un message